It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Undomiel
No, I don't think I could debate him. He's a scholar and I'm just an avid reader. Big difference. I do reserve the right to disagree with him, however.
The staff of Asclepius is considered the "true symbol of medicine" -- it features only one snake, and no wings.
Originally posted by Jamuhn
Assuming the two snakes were the two strands of DNA, the staff in the middle would be representative of the GATC inside of it, forming the building blocks of that DNA. Just a thought.
Originally posted by 1998OX4
Originally posted by nutzobalzo
Everyone has heard the story of the serpent in the garden and everyone knows that the serpent was regarded as the fallen angel Lucifer who probably had wings and everyone has seen the representation of DNA.
Do you think that this may be a subtle hint to our genetic make-up?
Hmm.
Nutzo
If that's the case, them maybe Adam was actually 'Atom' created on the Eve of birth of the planet. Maybe she got hungry and ate his rib. Maybe these jelly beans are supposed to taste like Chef boy-r-dee ravioli. Maybe Ronald Reagan was actually a woman and maybe we were supposed to take a dump out of our pores and not our backside. Meaning, maybe this is looking a little too deep.
The Caduceus vs the Staff of Asclepius:
drblayney.com...
Excerpt referenced from the above link:
"Despite the unequivocal claim of the staff of Asclepius to represent medicine (and healing), the caduceus, a rod with two entwined serpents topped by a pair of wings appears to be the more popular symbol of medicine in the United States, probably due to simple confusion between the caduceus and the staff of Asclepius, the true symbol of medicine. Many people use the word caduceus to mean both of these emblems." (Source: Dr Keith Blayney
MBChB; Dip Obst; FRNZCGP, 2000)
I tend to agree with Dr. Blayney. I believe the two serpents were either more asthetically pleasing (why not have one serpent when you can have two and throw in some wings while you are at it) or that there was honest confusion between the two in the centrys past.
[edit on 7-6-2004 by 1998OX4]
Originally posted by Undomiel
I suggest they cross reference all the beliefs on the planet, and where they all agree, the probability is highly likely, that it's the truth. Most truth appears to be common sense, .............
Some often wonder, "What is common sense?" I suggest they cross reference all the teachings of wise men down thru history and you'll get a real firm grasp on what is common sense. It's usually self-evident, but even moreso, can be seen in some of the laws of our planet.
Originally posted by mpeake
I do like the idea of our DNA changing when Adam and Eve disobeyed God in the Garden. We were in fact perfect and would be so today if not for the free will of man. This fall from grace changed everything in our physiological being. They would require a complete overhaul of our genes.
Originally posted by mpeake
would like someone with knowledge of the fallen angel theory to catch me up on that.
Originally posted by Undomiel
It isn't confusing to me at all that Baal is not God.
This ties right back to my initial contention that Jehovah Elohiym predates the gods (Fallen Angels/Annunaki) of ancient Sumeria cuneiform by several generations. Remember the post about An, Ki and Enlil? Baal is derived from the worship of Enlil. And I have already shown you how Enlil was an Annunaki/Fallen Angel and that Jehovah Elohiym predates him in an earlier post of mine (remember it?).
So to answer your question then, I would have to say that since God knows better than us what to call Himself, "I am," is the most applicable name of God from the Old Testament, the creator of all things. However, scripturally, He was called Jehovah Elohiym in the creation story, which is the earliest story of the bible. So there's 2 possible answers to your question:
1. The name He gave Himself in the Old Testament - "I am that I am" or simply "I am". Perhaps another way to say "The Eternal God."
2. The name the Old Testament texts gave Him - "Jehovah Elohiym" or "Jehovah" or "Elohiym" (which means LORD (Jehovah) God (Elohiym))
Yep, the Fallen Angels really made a mess of things with their false religions and the offspring nephilim. The resulting confusion had a powerful impact, thusly another reason why I think eventually everyone will be in Heaven, as the forces aligned against humanity were vast and God is, afterall, a just God. It even says in scripture it is His WILL that none should perish but have everlasting life. Sounds good to me!