It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ppk55
I'm not talking about the range of the lens, of bloody course a wide angle can reveal more of the scene, but it can't suddenly reveal the back of your shoulder or foot that a normal lens couldn't. That is what is being proposed here. A magical lens that you can aim at someone and it can reveal their backside. yeah.
Originally posted by samureyed
What? A convex lens (fisheye) will absolutely reveal more than a normal mirror. A large convex can reveal almost up to 180 degrees, while a normal mirror is much more limited.
[edit on 22-4-2010 by ppk55]
Originally posted by Vesica
This might aswell be from a trainingmission in the american deasert where many pictures have been taken in order to analyse the the astronauts agility in the suits.
This picture might also been taken slightly from above with a shutter on timer and therefor the camera is "hidden" and the "observer" without the suit is exposed.
Originally posted by jonnyc55
reply to post by scraze
This qoute states there were only 2 guys roaming around on the moon, but the answer were looking for now is... How come the guy in the reflection looks out of place?
If we can't manage to give a logical reason for the '2nd' man then we could say this was staged.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by wmd_2008
Jack's reflection is distorted in Gene's helmet. By looking at his shadow it can be seen that Jack is aiming his camera toward Gene.
The camera can be removed from the chest mount.
[edit on 4/22/2010 by Phage]
Originally posted by TortoiseKweek
I just have 1 question for those who say the photo was taken by the astronaut... How in God's name can his shadow point in 1 direction, but his body in another? That's not possible, your shadow on Earth "replicates" your outline . . . Am I missing something here?? Please explain to me how that is possible, without a 2nd light source??
(OMG, I 'm going to get flamed again in a number of days )
The light source has to come from the left to generate that image, yet it seems it was at an angle from the left to produce a shadow showing his "back pack"....
I don't know anymore, I'm confused... Someone PLEASE explain this to me.
[edit on 22-4-2010 by TortoiseKweek]