It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

is NATO logo inspired by the swastika?

page: 1
3

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 21 2010 @ 06:50 PM
link   
QUICK AND SHORT


History tells us that the nazi third reich ended in 1945, but did it really??

the nazi swastika:


another swastika:


NATO logo:


Nato logo morphs into a swastika

I think some occultists do believe that the swastika hold some kind of power, and they may wish to use it. the point of this thread was to raise you're awareness on this subject and from here you can draw you're own conclusions.

Hitlers third reich wanted to dominate by using military force.
this new reich plays a different trick, they use diplomacy to dominate.

the swastika like anything can mean nothing or everything, and can be used for good and evil...




posted on Apr, 21 2010 @ 07:09 PM
link   
You should take a look at this thread here: Secrets behind 'Logos'. Talks a little about the NATO/Swastika affair.



posted on Apr, 21 2010 @ 07:31 PM
link   
Looks like a compass.
A general rule of thumb is if you have to morph an image to look like what you say it is then it isn't what you say it is.



posted on Apr, 21 2010 @ 11:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Nventual
 



There is no such rule of thumb.

You're making this stuff up for the fun of it.





[edit on 21-4-2010 by Exuberant1]



posted on Apr, 22 2010 @ 04:15 AM
link   
It's my rule of thumb.



posted on Apr, 22 2010 @ 05:27 AM
link   
NATO logo mirrored with the Swastika part in black:



OMG, It is a SwatSticker when you look at it in the mirror - just like a vampire!






posted on Apr, 22 2010 @ 07:06 AM
link   
reply to post by RizeorDie
 


I really hate to go this far out on a limb, and suggest something so totally beyond the pale of common sense and evidence, but could it *possibly* be that the NATO logo is nothing more than a graphical representation of a 4-pointed star with the points half-shaded to form a modern version of a compass rose?

Nah. That's too outlandish. The "NATO is a continuation of the Third Reich" theory makes a lot more sense.



posted on Apr, 22 2010 @ 07:36 AM
link   
reply to post by RizeorDie
 


If you're actually looking for the Fourth Reich, you'd be more successful looking into the EU rather than NATO.

Revealed: The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich ...in the EU


The paper is aged and fragile, the typewritten letters slowly fading. But US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128 is as chilling now as the day it was written in November 1944.

The document, also known as the Red House Report, is a detailed account of a secret meeting at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944. There, Nazi officials ordered an elite group of German industrialists to plan for Germany's post-war recovery, prepare for the Nazis' return to power and work for a 'strong German empire'. In other words: the Fourth Reich.

The three-page, closely typed report, marked 'Secret', copied to British officials and sent by air pouch to Cordell Hull, the US Secretary of State, detailed how the industrialists were to work with the Nazi Party to rebuild Germany's economy by sending money through Switzerland.

They would set up a network of secret front companies abroad. They would wait until conditions were right. And then they would take over Germany again.

The industrialists included representatives of Volkswagen, Krupp and Messerschmitt. Officials from the Navy and Ministry of Armaments were also at the meeting and, with incredible foresight, they decided together that the Fourth German Reich, unlike its predecessor, would be an economic rather than a military empire - but not just German.



posted on Apr, 22 2010 @ 12:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Brother Stormhammer
reply to post by RizeorDie
 


I really hate to go this far out on a limb, and suggest something so totally beyond the pale of common sense and evidence, but could it *possibly* be that the NATO logo is nothing more than a graphical representation of a 4-pointed star with the points half-shaded to form a modern version of a compass rose?

Nah. That's too outlandish. The "NATO is a continuation of the Third Reich" theory makes a lot more sense.


its nothing more than a suggestion, if you have eyes in you're head and you can see that the nato logo does resemble a swastika in way way or another. if the all seeing eye is on the US dollar, and the pagan star of david is on the israeli flag, it wouldnt be too surprising to have the swastika to represent NATO.

why is it so hard for you to comprehend? in a time where countries stage attacks on its own soil to invade others then anything is possible.

logos are taken very seriously in the elites circle, they believe certain shapes bring certain powers.



posted on Apr, 22 2010 @ 12:55 PM
link   
reply to post by RizeorDie
 


Don't be so quick to call your second image link a swastika.
That one is actually backwards, like the one on this Buddha.



posted on Apr, 22 2010 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Alxandro
Don't be so quick to call your second image link a swastika.
That one is actually backwards, like the one on this Buddha.


Why? Just because it's backwards and not the same one used by the Nazis does not mean it isn't still called a swastika. The name swastika actually comes from Sanskrit language.



posted on Apr, 22 2010 @ 05:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Alxandro
reply to post by RizeorDie
 


Don't be so quick to call your second image link a swastika.
That one is actually backwards, like the one on this Buddha.


erm that is a swastika!



posted on Apr, 22 2010 @ 10:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheComte

Why? Just because it's backwards and not the same one used by the Nazis does not mean it isn't still called a swastika. The name swastika actually comes from Sanskrit language.


/Insert loud buzzer sound here

Wrong!

That is not a swastika!
Close but no cigar, that's actually a swavastika.

swaVAstika



posted on Apr, 23 2010 @ 12:29 AM
link   
reply to post by Alxandro
 


You are correct also but it can also be called a left-facing swastika and it would still be correct.



posted on Apr, 23 2010 @ 12:52 AM
link   
reply to post by RizeorDie
 


Not gonna lie. It kind of looks like you're grasping at straws on this one. With essentially a little bit of art skills, you can "morph" pretty much anything into another thing. There was even an animation where George Bush morphed into good 'ol Barrack. I think someone even here on ATS has one of the transitional pictures as their avatar. However, it doesn't mean Mr. Bush is Obama.

Like I said, with the imaginations here on ATS and a little bit of 1337 skillz, you can take any picture and make it look like something you want it to. This is a great example!

[edit on 123030p://555 by For(Home)Country]



posted on Apr, 23 2010 @ 03:10 AM
link   
We all know The USA via their masters will take the east including China, whilst the Russians via their masters will take Europe, sparing Britain as it is already a bought nation.



posted on Apr, 23 2010 @ 04:45 AM
link   
reply to post by For(Home)Country
 


actually there is a resemblance in the shapes of both NATO and the swastika, in other words you cant morph the star of david to look like a swastika because there is no resemblance. its simple, you just need eyes




top topics



 
3

log in

join