Freemason Knights Templar meeting here in Italy 2 days ago, changed my life..., page 44
Pages: <<  41    42    43    44  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 74 times


reply posted on 26-2-2012 @ 12:03 AM by ForkandSpoon
I came back because of further reading I have, done and have to say I'm sorry to see the combative tone. It's not my intent to argue my brother. Only to share what I have found. If you took that disagreement as a personal difference I apologize, that is not my intent. However making a personal attack based a difference of intellectual understanding, or questioning my masonic values is a bit over the top.

I still respectfully disagree that Operative Masonry founded Speculative Masonry.....I will say though there is a more interesting connection I have since read.....that marries both. The Templars as we know were only a very very very small portion Knights. The larger part of the order was actually in managing the massive holdings, buisinesses, and resources that were then used to fund those forces abroad. There were many advantages to doing buisiness with the Templars.....the best being their transactions could not be taxed; not by the local authority, or the church. Something that both gained them a huge financial advanatge and also helped build the resentment from the King of France. As a result many enterprises were done through the Templars to avoid taxation the same as most of us do more shopping online to do the same. The Templars DID in fact have their own in house masons. They were quite prolific in their building , and not simply of buildings "dedicated" to Templars in a more obvious way. Their huge holdings meant the building of everything from barns churches, craftworks (factories), etc.....but more so for those outside of the order, hiring the Local templar masons to build your proposed building meant, also being able to buy and trade materials tax free though them....and usually less graft and corruption. So pushing the limits of their tax free status many did in fact make use of the Templar masons for this purpose. Now these were not actual Templar Knights....rather the clerks....many if which did in fact have clerical training first and foremost. Having a prolific background in building before the end of the order, it would no small wonder that such groups would have stayed intact afterwards and founded any post Templar masonic guilds......this part is of course theory.....but certainly rational.

The Masonic traditions are deeply rooted in both the Bible we have and also in other early church books not included within the bible.......neither of which was freely available, the goals of that proto "Freemason" organization are clearly focused on keeping the early church traditions, and virtue alive during a time when a very corrupt religion was tyrannically supressing theological knowledge and not doing such a good job with the message of Christ. It also shows a sincere respect for Jewish traditions, and Islamic traditions....and openess with other faiths that is not simply out of character with the Church, but is out of character with most of western Europe accuustomed to demonizing these groups. However, again meshing well with an order who having spent most of it's history in the Holy Land and with these groups, and learned to govern, and work with these faiths to common purpose and interest.....I can not rationally see how a pure trade guild, no matter it's knowledge of trade, or even higher mathmatics, would be focused on theological ideas simply unknown to almost all but the most well read clergy, and at the same time open to working with and protecting religious minorities at a time of xenophobic hatred for them by the general populace.....The history of Speculative Masonry likely has many fathers, and that proto group before it became public was a safety network for many when persecution was very real for any who differed with the Catholic Church. The reformation has it's seeds there, most all modern protestant churches, the invisable college and thus the royal society has it's seeds there, most anyone who is in favor of church reform, has a reason to seek it's network of support and safety. Save of course that OTHER group.....so often reffered to here, that has embraced atheism, and as such is and always will be at odds with the very purpose of freemasonry.


reply posted on 8-3-2012 @ 11:33 PM by KSigMason
reply to post by guesswhoyouknew


There is the Masonic Knights Templar that is a part of the York Rite styled system, but they do not claim to be descendants of the medieval Templars. We only commemorate their name.

There have been many books written on the various perpetuation myths of the Crusade-era Templars and their possible link to Freemasonry. My favorite researcher and author is Stephan Dafoe (Past Sovereign Grand Historian, Canada).


reply posted on 9-3-2012 @ 09:56 AM by Pinocchio
While intrusion is generally not my norm. I find it quite irresistible shy away from.
Mostly because it says "Knight Templar is in fact Freemason"...
This thing, or idea has intruded in unto my life these past couple of days.
I struggled with the idea that they were in fact two distinct realities <--- If I can call them that.
I'm neither both and furthermore I'm not being apporached by them join.
What is happening is that epiphnay has some how gotten a hold of me and this time it doesn't seem to be letting go. It does not spark any intriugue, it only instills what I call the "Comedy of God" in me.
Anyhoo... my point!
Freemasonry is blue lodge degrees...
Knight Templar is a warrior rite by York that comes from choice...
Scottish rite, also by choice, is the pursuit of all that is contrary to war.

If this is true... Here is what it means to me.
In Freemasonry (a.k.a. Blue Lodge Degrees) there is the reality of aspiring to full fledge mastership. A Great thing to the self. Being a "Master Mason"
BUT! But in choosing to go higher one finds that that mastership is tried over and over again by...
When it is tried... You find two distinct realities... Knight Templar = Warrior and War.
Mason = Craftsman...
Which of the two is more acceptable to God??? Seeing that in my Religion which is solely based on tradition... it is both or none at all... But furthermore it states that one is certain death. The other incapable of being completed.


reply posted on 22-3-2012 @ 09:17 PM by ForkandSpoon
reply to post by Pinocchio



The York Rite is made of three different bodies all existing independently before it. The Templar degrees while they do have a certain military "flair" do not teach a military code....rather I assure you they seek to promote the central message of Jesus, Charity, and to love thy neighbor as they self. beleive it or not many better "warriors" in history fought the same values not against them....it is not the warrior code the Templar degrees seek to instill, rather it seeks to instill the values taught by Christ in those that would be warriors, it seeks to temper mans selfish and base nature with the values of Love and Pious living taught by Christ...I do beleive you are misinformed on that bit. If one is to be a warrior of any sort rathe rliteral or even in faith one must temper the baseness of conflict with the love of Christ.

Finally the York and and the Scottish Rite are not nor have they ever been at odds. Most every founder of the Scottish Rite was first a member of the York when it was began.....they teach much of the same. Lastly The Original Blue Lodge on which it is all based, is in itself a outgrowth of that earlier system then was in fact underground.....when you are persecuted, and hunted you must be willing to protect yourself and your loved ones.....this is not at odds with God's message and any reading of the bible makes it clear God has always recommended his people defend themselves. Wether or not there is any actual link to the Templars ( I admit to beleiving there is) there is actually a link to many different groups who all had common reason to seek each others common defense against persecution, The Templars make an apt symbol being persecuted falsly by those filled with greed and hatred....wether or not there is any historical link. If men through history fight for the same truths and values they are linked in virtue.....and in this way all men of all races and faiths who have fought for truth, to protect knowledge from deciever, and the right to worship freely have a common bond.....direct link or not.


reply posted on 22-4-2012 @ 11:57 PM by Matrix1111
reply to post by guesswhoyouknew



I agree. I don't get the point of this thread. I thought it was obvious to historians there was a connection of freemasonry and templar knights.


reply posted on 23-4-2012 @ 01:42 AM by KSigMason
reply to post by Matrix1111


Robert Cooper wrote a book about the Rosslyn Hoax (name of the book) and Stephen Dafoe in his book "Compasses & the Cross" talks about the various Templar perpetuation myths.

There is no actual, concrete evidence to say that the Freemasons stemmed from the Templars. In fact, there are documents that state Freemasonry may have existed almost 2-centuries prior to the establishment of the Templar Order.


reply posted on 23-4-2012 @ 01:28 PM by Matrix1111
reply to post by KSigMason



Thanks for the info. I'll check it out. But it doesn't change that fact that common knowledge says there's an unhidden relationship between freemasonry and the templars. (There's even a Knights Templar degree in freemasonry.)

I still don't see what the OP is upset about.


reply posted on 23-4-2012 @ 07:09 PM by KSigMason
reply to post by Matrix1111


I did enjoy Robert Lomas and Christopher Knight, but they do take some liberties in their theories.


reply posted on 23-4-2012 @ 07:26 PM by Matrix1111
reply to post by KSigMason



I agree. Everybody has an agenda (baggage). That comes with the territory.


reply posted on 23-4-2012 @ 10:24 PM by Pinocchio
Originally posted by KSigMason
reply to
post by Matrix1111


I did enjoy Robert Lomas and Christopher Knight, but they do take some liberties in their theories.


I read their "Hiram Key" and became enraged at the their theory about the bible testifying to the death of Hiram.
They did a good job in their presentation, but they crossed the line when they said Israel spoke about Hiram's death...
I'm grrr...

And: Pinocchio The Thread Coming Soon.

And: "Did I ever tell you about the time I broke a rock with a stick"?????


reply posted on 23-4-2012 @ 10:34 PM by Matrix1111
reply to post by ForkandSpoon



I wonder if "truth" can ever be recognized by imperfect people. Therein lies the problem. Also the road to hell is paved with the best of intention. Hence the confusion when it comes to conspiracy theories.

Who can we trust to reveal the truth?
Pages: <<  41    42    43    44  >>    ^^TOP^^



Fundamentalist Christianity: a mind control CULT?
  Posted 3 days ago with 36 member flags
A masons ring of the 32nd degree
  Posted 11 days ago with 11 member flags
Monarch programming - evidence or coincidence?
  Posted 3 days ago with 11 member flags
The Court System and Freemasonry.
  Posted 5 days ago with 10 member flags
Exposing Freemasons & 33 - Geometry,Astrology, or Devil Worship?
  Posted 6 days ago with 7 member flags
FACT: Buzz Aldrin claimed moon as a Scottish Rite \'Territory\'
  Posted 13 days ago with 6 member flags
Must Read! Elite Paedophile Ring.
  Posted 4 days ago with 6 member flags
I was a Mason and here\'s what I learned...
  Posted 2 days ago with 6 member flags