It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...
Okay...
So this decision was made prior to the 14th Amendment.
...
We were not designed to be one country with a Capital.
DC was not established until 1871.
The truth is, most people don't know what they are talking about, because they don't read. They don't read the documents that matter. The Treaties, The Incorporation Papers, and the Court Decisions.
You will ALWAYS be an American.
Someday they may come for you and tell you,you have to go home.
You will tell them this is my home.
They will tell you,no,you are an American,this is not your home,America is.
They will always think of you as an American living in THEIR country!
Originally posted by rnaa
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
The truth is, most people don't know what they are talking about, because they don't read. They don't read the documents that matter. The Treaties, The Incorporation Papers, and the Court Decisions.
I notice you have conspicuously left the Constitution out of your list. A 'Freudian' slip perhaps?.
It is obvious that Josephus23 has never read the Constitution. Perhaps you haven't either?
If one were to read the comments, then a very calm and congratulatory Josephus would be apparent; however, a very belligerent and insulting rnaa would be apparent.
Originally posted by rnaa
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
The truth is, most people don't know what they are talking about, because they don't read. They don't read the documents that matter. The Treaties, The Incorporation Papers, and the Court Decisions.
I notice you have conspicuously left the Constitution out of your list. A 'Freudian' slip perhaps?.
It is obvious that Josephus23 has never read the Constitution. Perhaps you haven't either?
The Constitution is an out dated document that felll into desuetude (an outdated doctrine that causes statutes and similar legislation to become un-enforceable by a habit of non-enforcement or lapse of time.) back in 1861.
snipped from article on 'desuetude' in Wikipedia
Desuetude does not apply to violations of the United States constitution. In Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York, 397 U.S. 664, 678 (1970), the United States Supreme Court asserted that: "It is obviously correct that no one acquires a vested or protected right in violation of the Constitution by long use, even when that span of time covers our entire national existence and indeed predates it."
extract from Peter Suber: The Paradox of Self-Amendment: Part 19
...If desuetude could apply to American constitutional rules, which has been debated,[Note 5] then parts of the AC could be repealed through desuetude. That, of course, would not constitute self-amendment, for desuetude is not authorized by the AC itself. It would constitute amendment of the AC by an "unofficial" method of amendment outside the AC, just as it would be if amended by judicial review or treaty.
One provision of the federal AC has never been used in the history of the clause: the provision for states to petition Congress to call a national convention.[Note 6] By "not used" I mean that while many states have petitioned Congress to call a convention, they have never triggered action by Congress under Article V to call such a convention. Could this provision fall into such neglect that it may no longer be used?
That is doubtful, even though the history of its neglect may constitute a practical (not legal) impediment to its use. The uncertainty of its operation combined with the gravity of its potential consequences is today probably the single greatest obstacle to its use; and much of the uncertainty about the clause is undoubtedly due to its non-use.
Genuine self-amendment of the AC through desuetude could occur only if the AC already allowed repeal by desuetude (say, by a prior act of self-amendment) and if that provision lapsed through desuetude...
extract from a forum posting here: MyOpenForum.com: The Unlawful Government
On March 28, 1861 the United States Congress adjourned sine die (without assigning a day for a further meeting or hearing, for an indefinite period to adjourn an assembly sine die). In other words Congress went home at the start of the Civil War with no intention on returning. To call the Congress back into session De jure (concerning law and principal) would have required the Speaker of the House and Majority Leader of the Senate to set the date at a later time.
This never ever happened. Let me repeat there has been no legally sat Congress or Senate per the United States Constitution since March 28, 1861.
The Congress was called back into session de facto (concerning fact and in practice) by President Abraham Lincoln who had not the Constitutional Authority or Power to do so.
reply to above from the same forum in the previous link (I have added some bolding for emphasis of the relevant part:
Who ever wrote this is proclaiming all most total bullsh--.
Art I Section 4 Paragraph 2
The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and such Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall by Law appoint a different Day.
It doesn't matter it they adjourned or not. The Constitution says that they MUST assemble once a year on the first Monday in December. This was modified later by the 20th Amendment to be Jan 3rd. And as provided by that amendment they moved it to the the next day should it fall on a Sunday.
So if they fail to assign the next session they must assemble again on the first Monday of December and not before, except:
And the President CAN call Congress into session.
Art II. Section 3
He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.