posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 09:28 AM
reply to post by Stormwind™
I suspect that I am on ignore for Stormwind
, so he/she won’t reply to this. Mind you, he/she did describe ATS as a blog, so I suppose they
have made it so by disregarding any contrary conversation.
So much for discussion…
Anyway, I will reply – and briefly – to this:
So I have to ask myself what kind of person would get worked up over wanting proof, no DEMANDING and then getting nasty when they dont get
What sort of person? The sort who regards ufology as important, unfounded theories promoted as real being diversions, and UFO sects as potentially
dangerous. What’s wrong with that?
No, skeptics are not the self-appointed internet police, here to guide people safely away from the perilous world of highly tentative ufology. What we
do want is some logical balance; a means to address both sides of the story, but without the unsettling interjection of sheer fantasy.
Being open minded should be encouraged.
Allowing blatant manipulation to taint the subject matter is not
being open minded.
A loony, or a government individual who is trying to discredit someone's post to all that will listen stirring up the herd to
You’re very quick to accuse and throw insults around, aren’t you? By the way; see the warning you've received? I reported you for your insulting
post to Jokei
Consider this as an alternative to your idea of dis-info agents existing on ATS; what if Greer, Muassan and the GFL etc. are the real