It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Report: Assad due in Egypt to discuss fear of Israel-Syria war
Come on Mubarak, you gotta face the reality here. You're old. You have a coming revolt on your hands, your government is just months away from being overthrown. Why? Because you're a US puppet. You know the egyptian people is sick of being led by a traitor.
Your people and yourself do not love Israel, like us.
The only chance for you to stay in power is to go with the people against Israel and you know deep down you want it too.
And contrary to the others wars, this time, our military is way more powerful and we can defeat the Zionists once and for all. Just look at Hizbollah successes in the last war. Also if you join the fight, you have a great army since you've got western equipment that can equal the zionist army, without you, our victory is not a certainty, but with you by our side, it's as certain as if Allah was inside each soldiers! Allah akbar!
So come and join us, or your government will fall.
Originally posted by JanusFIN
reply to post by thoughtsfull
BTW, I just saw first UFO formations few nights ago - maybe they are are here for very good reason. I hope they are monitoring closely our situation, because when I am watching peoples around me - I just know that they really cant handle whats coming... So lets hope that aliens will make their present clear and also helps us to solve our "bankster" problems.
[edit on 21-4-2010 by JanusFIN]
Originally posted by belial259
Originally posted by xpert11
An ANZAC task force could well be deployed in such a situation with New Zealand providing our SAS , a C-130 transport plane and maybe a frigate and a medical team
Well look at this way. If Australia actually had the stuff we'd ordered already, namely the f-35's and the two Canberra class ships and air warfare destroyers we'd certainly be able to make a dent in the Iranians, albeit a small one. Enough to clear the straits of their ships and get down to mine sweeping.
I just don't think we'd be able to sustain a beachhead for very long if at all without support from larger powers. And they'd probably sink our ships.
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu sounded an urgent note regarding the Iranian threat in a Monday interview on America's ABC network, saying that “we have a lot less time with each day that passes.”
“And the crucial thing,” he said, “is to use the time available for forceful international action led by the United States. If you can, go through the [UN] Security Council. If you can't, go outside the Security Council.”
“I spoke with President Obama when he was Senator Obama,” he said on the morning news show, Good Morning America. “He visited Israel. And I was the leader of the Opposition at… that time. And I said… if he gets elected President... all the issues that will flood his desk will one day be pushed aside by one overriding issue. And that is if Iran attempts to develop atomic bombs. Because they could very well either use it or threaten to use it or threaten to give it to terrorists or even give them a crude device with fissionable material that can be put in a container ship. And this could come to Manhattan or to any port in the United States or in Europe or, for that matter, in Israel.”
'A minimal requirement'
The international community can deliver “crippling sanctions” against Iran, he said. “If you stop … Iran from importing refined petroleum, that's a fancy word for gasoline,” Netanyahu explained, “then Iran simply doesn't have refining capacity and this regime comes to a halt. I think that's crippling sanctions. Now if the UN Security Council doesn't pass it because they'll dilute the resolution to get acquiescence of their members, then certainly the United States and other willing partners in the international community can... enforce these sanctions outside the Security Council. There is a way to deliver these crippling sanctions. This should be done now.”
“I think this is a minimal requirement right now,” he added. The point was “not really to send [Iran] messages," he said, “but to actually make this regime begin to make choices. Because right now they feel they don't have to make choices. They understand that the spotlight is on them but they're not doing anything. And the critical thing is I think there's an understanding in Washington, certainly in Jerusalem and quite a few other capitals in the world, that very forceful action has to be taken to make Iran stop. I think the future of peace in the world and of stability and security is at stake.”
Asked if he was worried that war could break out this summer, the prime minister said: “If it's up to us, there won't be any war." Iran, he added, is trying to create tensions through Hizbullah, “probably to deflect the world's attention from Iran's advancement and its plan to develop nuclear weapons.” (IsraelNationalNews.com)
Originally posted by Vitchilo
What about putting crippling sanctions ON YOUR GOVERNMENT AND THE IDF FOR ALL THE WAR CRIMES COMMITTED?
If Iran decides to go for nuclear weapons, the US may not be able to permanently stop this from happening unless it is willing to occupy the country.
This is the candid conclusion of one army general testifying in front of the Senate but one that seems to have gone mostly unnoticed amid a flurry of statements on Iran over the past few days in Washington.
Gen James Cartwright, one of America's top uniformed officers, slowly edged towards that conclusion during a Senate testimony last week, underscoring the difficult choices facing the Obama administration as it weighs what do about Iran.
Since the US would probably be extremely apprehensive about even considering putting boots on the ground in Iran, the statement raises a key question - while the Obama administration publicly maintains that it will not allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons, is it privately discussing how to live with a nuclear Iran?
Originally posted by Vitchilo
I say either DRAFT and invasion ... or leave Iran alone. The others choices are too crazy... even Draft and invasion is crazy... Leave Iran alone... if we could trust Stalin and Mao and Kim Jong Il with nukes, we sure as hell can trust Iran with them.
[edit on 21-4-2010 by Vitchilo]
BEIRUT: The leaders of Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Egypt were expected to convene in the Egyptian resort of Sharm el-Sheikh Thursday after Western diplomatic sources in Riyadh told the newspaper Al-Quds al-Arabi that talks to arrange the meeting had been under way since the beginning of the week.
According to the sources, Saudi King Abdullah was due to arrive at Sharm el-Sheikh Thursday to congratulate Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak for his recovery after surgery he underwent last month.
The sources added that Syrian President Bashar Assad was also to head to the resort and meet with Mubarak Thursday.
The report said that during the three-way summit, the leaders would discuss Iran’s nuclear program, the situation in Iraq following the general polls and the attempts to reconcile Palestinian groups Fatah and Hamas.
Read more: www.dailystar.com.lb...
(The Daily Star :: Lebanon News :: www.dailystar.com.lb...)
Originally posted by RizeorDie
this reminds me of the gearing up to war events prior to ww2.
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
Originally posted by RizeorDie
this reminds me of the gearing up to war events prior to ww2.
Reminds me more of World War I.
I'm expecting a Guns of August scenario to kick off the next world war.
Originally posted by Retrovertigo
I certainly hope they'd sink our ships, and kill all Australian military personnel involved in any attack on Iran, which would be just desserts IMO...
Originally posted by freetree64
All option's open!!!!!!!! Let's hope it's not true???
Originally posted by belial259
I can honestly see my government having to
bring back steam trains.