It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SheaWolf
reply to post by fernx
Wow...100 acres??
Check out Reader's Digest's "Back to Basics".
www.amazon.com...
I've read this book many times, the theme is "self-sufficient on 5 acres", animals and all. It's not child's play, it's work, but well worth the effort.
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by fernx
Grain, Legume and Animal husbandry are all only at most a 10,000 year old *invention*.
The roughly 2.5 million years of human evolution did not include all this junk. Nut's, fruits vegetables, fish, insects, and occasional wild game is what our diet *should* consist of. Not Cereal for breakfast, Nachos for lunch and a T-Bone steak for dinner.
This is why we have to farm, there is not enough "natural" food available on earth to feed 7 billion people.
Where I live there is 1.5 deer per person, so lets say I eat one deer per year in a few years there would be no deer.
(which would be my occasional wild game, as you state) Then I would have to pick on some other wild animal or fish or what ever, it does not add up with our currant population.
Now with 7 billion people on earth show me the links that support your claim there is enough edible wild bugs in to world for 7 billion people and that we will not wipe out a insect species eating these bugs. And if you say we can farm them well that is the same as farming beef and crops. Lets see proof and links, I know we can eat bugs but if everyone did they would be wiped out too. Show your numbers and links. Do you know what happens when all the bugs are gone?????I do.
every week from moscow
to madagascar, ronald mcdonald's smile warms the hearts of all people regardless of race.color, creed, sex and social status by opening 3 new mcdonalds restaurants as ambasador of my country, america, ronald personally invites you to join him on his quest to end world hunger enjoy
Besides, red meat causes inflammatory diseases. Obviously that garbage isn't meant for human consumption, along with milk, grains and legumes.
What are these "inflamatory diseases" you keep talking about.
I really doubt insects are going to save the planet.
Sure cows take more watter and eat grass but water is the most abundant resource on the planet and is always recycling its self.
Meat is good for you even cimps in the wild eat it.
So maybe we should be eating other primates from time to time.
If you don't like the quick easy reference of wikipedia, then there are numerous medical articles that you can look up to verify the validity of the statements made from wikipedia
So long as people continuously say eww to them. Just got my book on how to cook the little buggers up today! Tomorrow I'm going to order some from online and try a few recipes.
Fresh potable water fit for human consumption is not the most abundant resource. Of all the water available on this planet, only a small fraction of that water is actually drinkable.
I've already gone over this argument. Of the four great apes, humans and chimps are the only one's that consume meat. Chimpanzee diets are 90% vegetarian, consisting of fruits, nuts and seeds. Of the last ten percent, a significant portion of that goes to insects and then they occasionally hunt for infant red colobus mostly. If you read the article rather than linking it without question, you would notice this sentence:
"Chimpanzees are largely fruit eaters, and meat composes only about 3% of the time they spent eating overall, less than in nearly all human societies."
No, we should be eating fish instead of red meats.
en.wikipedia.org...
Yeah people who do not eat red meat still get those diseases.
Yeah i breed them, they are nasty little things, they will eat their own crap and grom mold on themselves.
Yeah i breed them, they are nasty little things, they will eat their own crap and grom mold on themselves.
Yeah "the man" has these huge plants where they turn non drinkable water into drinkable water. You can do it yourself it is not exactly rocket science.
www.janegoodall.org...
gorillas too. Keep in mind the gorilla was thought to be a mgaical creature so there is much more to learn.
Over fishing is already a huge problem i do not see how eliminating red meat and eating more fish would help anything.
You are just utterly lazy aren't you? LMFAO!
READ that link. Quote from it. Do you have problems with comprehension? Here is one sentence to start with:
"Mortality from ischemic heart disease was 24% lower in vegetarians than in nonvegetarians"
Enjoyed the wonderful laugh, thanks!
Non-lean red meat
Other studies, in contrast, have shown no significant differences between vegetarians and nonvegetarians in mortality from cerebrovascular disease, stomach cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, or prostate cancer, although the sample of vegetarians was small and included ex-smokers who had switched their diet within the last five years
"British vegetarians have low mortality compared with the general population. Their death rates are similar to those of comparable non-vegetarians, suggesting that much of this benefit may be attributed to non-dietary lifestyle factors such as a low prevalence of smoking and a generally high socio-economic status, or to aspects of the diet other than the avoidance of meat and fish."
5 out of 5 studies indicated that adults who followed a low meat, high plant-food diet pattern experienced significant or marginally significant decreases in mortality risk relative to other patterns of intake.
Cows eat their own vomit as part of it's digestive process.
Pigs, like the above insects, will eat the feces of herbivores that leave a significant amount of semi-digested matter.
Yea, perfect idea genius. Let's destroy a mountain to get it's coal to burn to turn our generators to provide the electricity needed to distill the water from the ocean and then dump the resulting waste from the desalination plant (which is classified as an industrial waste) back into the ocean. Nah, can't see any problems occurring with removing water and increasing the salinity of our oceans.
Again, learn to read. The article does not say Gorillas eat meat.
Now, there's evidence raising the possibility gorillas also eat small vertebrates such as monkeys and antelope
Wild caught overfishing, yes. Farmed fishing no. I don't see how you can continuously keep posting without any tangible, valid arguments.
Yeah it also says
Non-lean red meat
which is a huge difference between a mcdonnalds burger, a lean steak and greasy ribs.
Research has shown that cooking certain meats at high temperatures creates chemicals that are not present in uncooked meats. A few of these chemicals may increase cancer risk. For example, heterocyclic amines (HCAs) are the carcinogenic chemicals formed from the cooking of muscle meats such as beef, pork, fowl, and fish. HCAs form when amino acids (the building blocks of proteins) and creatine (a chemical found in muscles) react at high cooking temperatures. Researchers have identified 17 different HCAs resulting from the cooking of muscle meats that may pose human cancer risk.
it also says
Other studies, in contrast, have shown no significant differences between vegetarians and nonvegetarians in mortality from cerebrovascular disease, stomach cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, or prostate cancer, although the sample of vegetarians was small and included ex-smokers who had switched their diet within the last five years
"British vegetarians have low mortality compared with the general population. Their death rates are similar to those of comparable non-vegetarians, suggesting that much of this benefit may be attributed to non-dietary lifestyle factors such as a low prevalence of smoking and a generally high socio-economic status, or to aspects of the diet other than the avoidance of meat and fish."
5 out of 5 studies indicated that adults who followed a low meat, high plant-food diet pattern experienced significant or marginally significant decreases in mortality risk relative to other patterns of intake.
Cows eat their own vomit as part of it's digestive process.
Everyone "eats their own vomit" .
Pigs, like the above insects, will eat the feces of herbivores that leave a significant amount of semi-digested matter.
Yeah pigs will eat the crap of herbivores but that fine i really don't eat pig they are nasty little buggers that eat their own crap.
en.wikipedia.org...
Its a bit more complicated than that.
One disadvantage is that chlorination of residual organic material can generate chlorinated-organic compounds that may be carcinogenic or harmful to the environment.
However, recent evidence has demonstrated that very low levels of specific contaminants in wastewater, including hormones (from animal husbandry and residue from human hormonal contraception methods) and synthetic materials such as phthalates that mimic hormones in their action, can have an unpredictable adverse impact on the natural biota and potentially on humans if the water is re-used for drinking water.
www.dancingrabbit.org...
these guys on the other hand do just dump their poop into nearby watter. You might want to check it out they have a whole little eco village that would be right up your alley, and many things that do not make sense.
Like they use solar power but use the compact flourecent lights which have mercury. If you are using free energy from the sun why would it matter if you were using an energy saving bulb?
They also use Hu-manure which is just a fancy green name for en.wikipedia.org... night soil, which is just another bad name for human crap that gives you tapeworms. But you said tapeworms have lots of protien so you should be good.
Now, there's evidence raising the possibility gorillas also eat small vertebrates such as monkeys and antelope
but the researchers involved say more study is needed. The study was intended to examine bonobos' meat-eating habits, using gorillas in Loango National Park in Gabon as a control. The evidence showed animal DNA infeces of both control and study groups.
en.wikipedia.org...
that is a whole other can of worms. How much fresh natural earth mother tree hugging watter does it take to keep a fish farm and keep the fish water clean? Fish farming is worse than the caged chickens those things are sick and sad. They have to add dye to salmon to get it red because their meat is not even the right color in a fish farm. But right now you can get a big mac for 2.49 and by doing so you are helping ronald mcdonnald charaty houses across the nation. By purchasing organic stuff from organic farmers you are only aiding to their ongoing greed and choke hold they have on the hippy community.
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by fernx
Now with 7 billion people on earth show me the links that support your claim there is enough edible wild bugs in to world for 7 billion people and that we will not wipe out a insect species eating these bugs. And if you say we can farm them well that is the same as farming beef and crops.
en.wikipedia.org...
Farming insects is not analogous to farming livestock as the they don't require acres upon acres of pasture to graze on, require less food and water than animal husbandry. Your concerns are ill thought out and the argument against it only becomes valid if we get all the insects from the wild alone.
[edit on 25-4-2010 by sirnex]
Your opening line " The Earth provides for our every need for free."
You are contradicting youself again! You can not farm these bugs for free to feed 7 billion people! I liked some of the numbers like:
This gives house crickets a true food conversion efficiency almost 20 times higher than beef.[10]
and
Production of 150g of grasshopper meat requires only very little water, while cattle requires 3290 liters to produce the same amount of beef.[25]
But it is not for free! Start a new thread and think about your topic line carefully....you are on the right track but people will not listen when you contradict yourself.
cheers
You are contradicting youself again! You can not farm these bugs for free to feed 7 billion people!
I liked some of the numbers like:
This gives house crickets a true food conversion efficiency almost 20 times higher than beef.[10]
and
Production of 150g of grasshopper meat requires only very little water, while cattle requires 3290 liters to produce the same amount of beef.[25]
But it is not for free! Start a new thread and think about your topic line carefully....you are on the right track but people will not listen when you contradict yourself.
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by fernx
[QUOTE]Your opening line " The Earth provides for our every need for free."
It may not charge me for the dandelion
BUT
what about the flour, milk baking powder, eggs, oil, and all the other ingredients in the fritter!
You are contradicting yourself again! You say don't eat flour or other animal products like milk, but now you are telling me to eat a dandelion fritter!!!! LOL LOL
Also to cold here for dandelions yet! So I think I will have MY fresh farm raised eggs and bacon today with a side of toast. (got the bread from the store but the rest was raised on my farm)
Give it up...this is pointless. I will not be sucked into resonding to your nonsense again.
Your doing it wrong and hopefully this little debate of ours will help you out in school if you ever decide to take debate class and learn how to actually debate an issue.
www.cancer.gov...
Research has shown that cooking certain meats at high temperatures creates chemicals that are not present in uncooked meats. A few of these chemicals may increase cancer risk. For example, heterocyclic amines (HCAs) are the carcinogenic chemicals formed from the cooking of muscle meats such as beef, pork, fowl, and fish. HCAs form when amino acids (the building blocks of proteins) and creatine (a chemical found in muscles) react at high cooking temperatures. Researchers have identified 17 different HCAs resulting from the cooking of muscle meats that may pose human cancer risk.
*FACEPALM* Please make note of the now bold text from your quote.
It'll do you a world of wonder to take a look at the report itself. They determined this from a questionnaire between the 70's and 80's that was based on dietary habits. Not entirely a very scientific or accurate study. Good try though!
Not sure why this one is in here as I've never said we have to drop meat.
The study is right, a diet more closely resembling that of our closest primate relatives will certainly prolong our life expectancy as that is the diet we evolved to eat, not the diet we invented for ourselves.
I can find no reference to them dumping their excrement into nearby water.
Good question, they should either move to LED which saves even more energy and doesn't contain mercury.
First, I never said anything about eating tapeworms, although you have numerous times in a heated effort to continue being a complete smart ass. Secondly, humanure is no more dangerous than any other animal waste used as composting/fertilizer material.