It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by skunknuts
If I were you, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting on the Tea Party to get unified behind any specific issue. According to almost every poll I've seen, they are almost evenly divided on every issue except for their hatred for president Obama.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by candide
I have to wonder how long the republicans can get away with attacking illegal imigrants personally but almost completely ignored the companies that hired them the entire time they were in power.
Well, Obama has shown that he is quite anti-business. So we can expect him to jump all over those companies that hire illegals, right?
Originally posted by Legion2112
Originally posted by skunknuts
Can you imagine if a similar bill was passed in Wisconsin w/ regards to Canada? How would you react if the government could harass and demand proof of citizenship if they determine that you reasonably appear Canadian??
[edit on 4/20/2010 by skunknuts]
The last time I checked, Canadians weren't sneaking across the border and killing ranchers in Wyoming or Montana... the same can't be said for AZ. I realize that the measures being considered right now in that corner of the country are considered draconian to some, but at one who used to live in that neck of the woods I can tell you for a fact that the problem is only going to get worse and no amount of crying by the left will change that.
Besides, it's not that difficult to figure out who would be targeted by law enforcement for citizenship verification - if you get pulled over, you barely speak a lick of English and you have no documentation at all as to who you are or what country you're a citizen of, chances are you're getting locked up. It's not that outrageous of a demand.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by Angus123
Yep!
Nothing says it like saying "You're fired!" to the CEO of GM
Nothing says it like "And with this bailout we now own 60% of GM"
Nothing says it like "Bank execs, your top salary allowed by the goverment is...."
Nothing says it like "If you own a coal company, you're gonna go bankrupt under Cap and Trade".
Originally posted by Angus123
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by Angus123
Yep!
Nothing says it like saying "You're fired!" to the CEO of GM
Nothing says it like "And with this bailout we now own 60% of GM"
Nothing says it like "Bank execs, your top salary allowed by the goverment is...."
Nothing says it like "If you own a coal company, you're gonna go bankrupt under Cap and Trade".
Nothing says you have to make a coherent point other than the fact that you hate the man and would whine and moan no matter what he does either.
But hey... if you like having the banks and other large businesses screwing you blue with no safeguards, who am I to judge?
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by Angus123
You don't know crap about my politics, so stop trying to pretend you do.
And the man that you so blindly follow, Barack Hussein Obama, happily accepted millions of dollars from those he will now "regulate", including $1.2 million from G-S. So who's the fool here?
Originally posted by Logarock
Originally posted by Angus123
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by Angus123
Yep!
Nothing says it like saying "You're fired!" to the CEO of GM
Nothing says it like "And with this bailout we now own 60% of GM"
Nothing says it like "Bank execs, your top salary allowed by the goverment is...."
Nothing says it like "If you own a coal company, you're gonna go bankrupt under Cap and Trade".
Nothing says you have to make a coherent point other than the fact that you hate the man and would whine and moan no matter what he does either.
But hey... if you like having the banks and other large businesses screwing you blue with no safeguards, who am I to judge?
Dude you are a zero troll with this. What are you into this idea that no one can disagree without being a racist?
The guy is a dem for pete's sake. Past that it doesnt matter what he is.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by Angus123
Uhh...you call the illegal firing of a CEO a regulatory measure?
Well, when you're an apologist full of white guilt, as you are, you see anyone that disagrees with your messiah as full of hate.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by Angus123
You think calling me a racist is going to evoke some kind of reaction?
Stupid little liberal tricks don't bother me at all. Call me whatever you want. It's a well-known fact that those who hurl the charge of racism are in fact closet racists themselves.
So go ahead and call me racist, if that's all you got. And it does appear that's all you got.