posted on Apr, 20 2010 @ 04:36 PM
The analysis you linked to is intriguing (star for you!) and displays that the writer is paying attention, in general. However, it also displays that
their attention span is a bit short in duration and maturity. I have good reason for saying these things, but they are harder to understand than the
writer's analysis and require a larger ability to process extremely complex constructs into more basic/rational terms without loosing so much meaning
as to be useless. I am willing to share, but do not have time to waste, nor do I care to be flamed/fought with. I have no problem with disagreement
or questioning/argument, but arguing in pursuit of understanding is not the same as arguing/quarreling to justify an incomplete rationale.