It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Of all the "Moon Landing Hoax" nonsense 'theories' that abound, this one is still getting traction?
Cannot understand why.....
Originally posted by Korg Trinity
Because it is imposable to accept that the astronauts didn't have 5 minutes to do what surely would be a very human thing to do.
I have stated previously if you have ever walked along the edge of cliff, there is an almost irresistible urge to look over the edge.
Surely, Looking up at the stars would have been a similar irresistible pull to look up, to experience the stars looking like they have never seen them
Originally posted by The Matrix Traveller
Taking photos of the Stars, is totally different than seeing them, with your naked eyes.
We don’t require a shutter speed or exposure time, as in the case of using photographic film.
As there is reported to be No atmosphere on the moon, then there is No light scatter in an atmosphere as there is on Earth, thus No absorption of Light above the surface of the Moon, hence no illumination, from light scatter.
The reason for why you can't see stars from Earth during daytime, is because the Atmosphere is illuminated to the point, there is more light from our atmosphere, than any individual star, planet or moon, except in the case of our moon, Venus and perhaps Jupiter on odd occasions.
It is a case of the ratio of Light, i.e. if more Light (density of Light per square mm) comes from an object in space, that that which illuminates our atmosphere, that object will be seen.
Two things are involved in filming...
a. The amount of Light gathered.
b. The makeup of the photographic film... (requiring exposure time etc.)
Originally posted by The Matrix Traveller
reply to post by CHRLZ
Sorry I am Not an expert such as yourself....
So let you give us all an explanation of your Great Wisdom and Knowledge....
Originally posted by Korg Trinity
Originally posted by The Matrix Traveller
reply to post by CHRLZ
Sorry I am Not an expert such as yourself....
So let you give us all an explanation of your Great Wisdom and Knowledge....
I must admit CHRLZ sounds very holier than thou...
Anyone who says that they would not attempt to look at the stars if they went to the moon are either dead or a robot.
And it is not what was said at the conference...
korg.
Originally posted by Korg Trinity
Originally posted by The Matrix Traveller
reply to post by CHRLZ
Sorry I am Not an expert such as yourself....
So let you give us all an explanation of your Great Wisdom and Knowledge....
I must admit CHRLZ sounds very holier than thou...
Anyone who says that they would not attempt to look at the stars if they went to the moon are either dead or a robot.
And it is not what was said at the conference...
And since we have discussed the visor so much in this thread and stars, after all the sun is a star right?? what about the following video.
A pentagon sun huh?? I'll have to dig out some Mylar and have a look at that, I always thought the sun was a globe.....
korg.
[edit on 24-4-2010 by Korg Trinity]
Originally posted by Korg Trinity
Originally posted by The Matrix Traveller
Sorry I am Not an expert such as yourself....
So let you give us all an explanation of your Great Wisdom and Knowledge....
I must admit CHRLZ sounds very holier than thou...
Anyone who says that they would not attempt to look at the stars if they went to the moon are either dead or a robot.
And since we have discussed the visor so much in this thread and stars, after all the sun is a star right??
A pentagon sun huh?? I'll have to dig out some Mylar and have a look at that, I always thought the sun was a globe.....
Originally posted by Truth1000
Exactly what proof do you want?
Originally posted by CHRLZ
but if anyone else thinks that garbage is relevant, let me know and I'll to go through that video point by point in EXCRUCIATING DETAIL.
Yes, another bit of 'intensive research there', and the fact that BOTH of you avoided any proper discussion of any of the major points I raised..?
Originally posted by Korg Trinity
Radiation and Vast Electrostatic discharge..
The 60's was a time when government controlled TV and so they could get you to watch what ever they wanted you to see.
Photo's you give as evidence, photo's that are obviously faked or touched up. And this is supposed to be official proof??
The reason it was faked was because it would have been the end for nasa if they sent up people in front of the whole planet who then subsequently died right on TV.... and in the 60's that would have been devastatingly negative.
Those that lived through it have to believe its true because of the feeling of the era that the moment created of how much humans have achieved etc etc.. their generation etc etc...
the computer aboard Apollo had less processing power than your mobile phone... FACT....
Tell me why have we not been back since??? Not even tried????
Originally posted by Korg Trinity
Originally posted by CHRLZ
but if anyone else thinks that garbage is relevant, let me know
Like you you did there by saying that the evidence presented is garbage but giving no reason as to why you feel that was the case.
Are you really trying to say that there is no difference in the images
of the sun from Apollo to other pictures we have from earth orbit??
.. not being dark-adapted so they couldn't see stars.
And this is going of subject as the argument is not about having to overexpose the foreground to get enough light from the stars in contrast... This is about the astronauts eyes...
and if you are saying that the stars would not be brighter on the moon than a clear night on earth then you are obviously not an astronomer at all.
Originally posted by Korg Trinity
Radiation and Vast Electrostatic discharge on the surface of the moon. These are critical obstacles that would have had to have been addressed for a real mission to the moon were not given much thought and very little if at all any protection against these two deadly forms of danger.
the computer aboard Apollo had less processing power than your mobile phone... FACT
Tell me why have we not been back since??? Not even tried????