It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Revealed: Iraq Terrorists' Deadly New Tactic

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 20 2010 @ 01:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Drexl
Probably the english SAS at work again. Not as if they have not done it before in documented accounts , Kenya and the Yemen at least.


Loving the ignorance of UKSF firstly the SAS is British not English, in fact most of the SAS are said to be Scottish in any case Task Force Knight has left Iraq along with the rest of UK forces. Could you please show us the documented proof the SAS have done this in the past?
Notwithstanding your ignorance of UKSF what could the coalition forces possibly have to gain from effectively launching false flag operations in a state they are trying to stabilise to undermine a presidential candidate who they support?




posted on May, 1 2010 @ 08:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by Thepreye
 



A good tactic in Afghanistan would be to place hundreds of bits of metal along roads, so they'd glint and are visible. This compels the occupation forces to get out of vehicles to inspect for ied's, making them vulnerable to real ied's or snipers at the very least it would reduce movement along the road to a snails pace.


Just what are you getting at with a statement like this??

These are terrorist tactics that are being used. Plain and simple. Hell, another suicide bomber just wiped out 40 innocent people in Baghdad. No special forces at work here. Just your everyday terrorists.


How do you know they were "innocent people"? looks like iraqis adopted the bush-like doctrine: "you are either with us, or them".

All things are relative, those fighting to free themselves from US occupation / puppet rule see iraqis who side with the occupier as un patriotic collaborators, enemies of the iraqi people..

Lets not pretend US citizens who sided with a chinese occupier against their zip code brethren would be seen as "great americans"... good ole american chew spit'n crap-kickers who bleed red, white and blue would target US traitors with equal brutally..

When the US reduces an entire village to pablum targeting ONE guy who is allegedly a bad guy, it's cool.. when iraqi resistance blasts 40 people to bits targeting their enemy, it's terrorism... neat how that works to shape a mind set, eh?..



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 11:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by Drexl

Originally posted by azzllin
reply to post by Drexl
 


Why the SAS? we don't have any interest in Iraq any more, why cant it be down to some American or Israeli special forces? who do have a vested interest in Iraq.

We did our job and left like we promised.


They have a history of this kind of activity. Perhaps you believe the activities of these kind of agencies cease when their government officially declares their non interest in further participation to the general public?


No what I believe is 22 Regiment or any other British Regiment do not target friendly targets, or deliberately kill innocent people, I am sure there are instances where they do jobs they do not agree with, but killing the innocent is not one of them, the news would leak out, while the way they work is kept secret, for obvious reasons, the British army has always had pride in their work, get the job done and go home, we have no interest in occupying Iraq, and it serves no purpose to blow up a building to kill allied soldiers at all.

22 Regiment are still and always will be the best Regiment in the World, look up the facts and you will see their record, Blue on Blue is a very rare occurrence, sometimes it goes pear shaped, but that is down to intelligence, then look at the Blue on Blue incidents carried out by other countries, it may surprise you who holds top spot.

It just wouldn't happen without word getting out, same reason our troops would not fire on the British people under Government orders, they have Families on those same streets, if the British Gov are responsible, then it is inside the security services under orders from some politician, but again word would out, they are watched too closely by not just the people, but branches of the intelligence units who do not serve the Government but work only to protect the country and it's citizens.

Yes that's right we have an agency who keeps an eye on our Government, to ensure they do the job they pay we pay them to do, one of the joys of having a monarchy, they serve her, and the people not the 4-5 yr term of a possible dictator, it keeps us GREAT BRITAIN.

God save Lizzie.



posted on May, 10 2010 @ 02:30 AM
link   
I say follow the money. If we're to believe that Iraq is doing so well in modernization and recovery, surely there must be records of property rentals and payments can be traced. Find out who rented the buildings, trace the payments. That will lead you to the guilty party. But it will never happen.



new topics

top topics
 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join