The site of a fire which destroyed more than 100 works of
art was burgled before the blaze began, say police.” One of the smaller units where the fire actually began appears to have suffered a burglary, but
it is yet to be established if the fire was deliberately started." I first heard about this last week and if my first thought where true then I
believe that the alleged stolen artwork is either destined for the black-market or for a private collector
A Scotland Yard spokeswoman said: "It is now believed that the fire began in a particular unit. The warehouse had 34 units in total - two main
ones and 32 smaller ones. "One of the smaller units where the fire actually began appears to have suffered a burglary, but it is yet to be
established if the fire was deliberately started."Momart's managing director Eugene Boyle said the company was still not able to access the site due
to ongoing police investigations.Modern art mogul Charles Saatchi
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
If it turns out true that some of the art work is stolen, Many pieces of beautiful artwork Have been destroyed or are being sold on the blackmarket,.
Most likely is that the artwork could have been stolen to order for either a very high up buissness man or private collector art work like this was
ment for public display not for one mans greedyness.
Hey Thanks for the link Gryffen I knew I was missing something.
I mean its not all a lost cause I still think some of the art work can be
re-created and not all that much of a lost cause to say those people got something for nouther when it was first created they did well
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.