It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Scarcer
Walmart destroys economies, lowers workers' standards, puts locally owned businesses out of work, and forces people to look elsewhere for work.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by Scarcer
Walmart destroys economies, lowers workers' standards, puts locally owned businesses out of work, and forces people to look elsewhere for work.
Walmart is simply changing the face of capitalism through its business model. To claim that Walmart is somehow evil and that those who shop there are destroying the economy is ludicrous and extreme.
Originally posted by dgtempe
I wouldnt worry too much. Walmart is very low in stock, have taken out the self checks, and i do believe they are going downhill FAST! I wouldnt be surprised if they all go under real soon.
Originally posted by Scarcer
Sorry but I found your comment rather bland, on what grounds do you have to say it's ludicrous, what good is it doing for our economy?
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by Scarcer
Sorry but I found your comment rather bland, on what grounds do you have to say it's ludicrous, what good is it doing for our economy?
My opinion that claiming Walmart as [paraphrased] "evil" and that by shopping there one is destroying the economy is ludicrous is all the grounds I need. Purchasing products stimulates the economy. Walmart employs people who may not have other opportunities for employment. Attracting customers by offering a huge selection and lower prices is one of the great things about capitalism.
And likewise, I find all the anti-Walmart rhetoric quite bland. If you don't like it you're free to shop elsewhere. As long as they have a good price on something I want, they get my cash.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by Scarcer
Sorry but I found your comment rather bland, on what grounds do you have to say it's ludicrous, what good is it doing for our economy?
My opinion that claiming Walmart as [paraphrased] "evil" and that by shopping there one is destroying the economy is ludicrous is all the grounds I need. Purchasing products stimulates the economy. Walmart employs people who may not have other opportunities for employment. Attracting customers by offering a huge selection and lower prices is one of the great things about capitalism.
And likewise, I find all the anti-Walmart rhetoric quite bland. If you don't like it you're free to shop elsewhere. As long as they have a good price on something I want, they get my cash.
Originally posted by severdsoul
Walmart going out of business.. *LOL* now you are funny. Pass me some of what you are smoking.
They didn't get to where they are to let a mistake take them out of business.
While there are pro's and cons to a store that large, we are stuck with them, and they are not going anywhere any time soon.
While many bash them, they do pay the workers decent. A lot better than a lot of minimal jobs get.
Originally posted by LurkerMan
reply to post by Scarcer
lower prices = you save money.
i know spare me all the evils, i watched the movies. im just saying everybody always seems to forget to factor in the most obvious part of the equation, and that is the fact that all their products are cheaper than alternatives, so the consumer ends up with more money, to spend on other things.
thus improving the economy.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Your analysis of walmart is very self-centered and shallow. What is good for consumers IS SIMULTANEOUSLY bad for employees and the economy.
This is EXACTLY what is wrong with unfettered capitalism because given the opportunity to save a few bucks, 90% of any given community will take advantage of so-called "sales" to:
(1) drive out small business because they can't compete price-wise
(2)force walmart staff, especially low level employees, to get mistreated and underpaid.
(3)encourage companies to go overseas due to cheap labor, lax enviromental laws, low tariffs, etc.
[edit on 18-4-2010 by EarthCitizen07]
Originally posted by LurkerMan
reply to post by Scarcer
lower prices = you save money.
i know spare me all the evils, i watched the movies. im just saying everybody always seems to forget to factor in the most obvious part of the equation, and that is the fact that all their products are cheaper than alternatives, so the consumer ends up with more money, to spend on other things.
thus improving the economy.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
I hate to be repetitive but that is what people get for allowing(or even wanting) uncontrolled capitalism. The right wingers want small government(no checks and balances) so it is only natural for companies to develop into natural monopolies, each monopolising a sector of business.
In turn, these companies get so big that government gets rendered helpless. I am talking about microsoft, cisco, goldman sachs, jp morgan & chase, walmart, home depot, the federal reserve(yes its a private corporation), the petroleum companies, etc.
Government should be an extension of the people and primarily(but not entirely) look after the people. Thanks to THE FAR RIGHT it has become exactly the opposite.
Originally posted by Scarcer
Research Costco on the other hand, low prices without compromising worker standards and great customer service.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Your analysis of walmart is very self-centered and shallow. What is good for consumers IS SIMULTANEOUSLY bad for employees and the economy.
This is EXACTLY what is wrong with unfettered capitalism because given the opportunity to save a few bucks, 90% of any given community will take advantage of so-called "sales" to:
(1) drive out small business because they can't compete price-wise
(2)force walmart staff, especially low level employees, to get mistreated and underpaid.
(3)encourage companies to go overseas due to cheap labor, lax enviromental laws, low tariffs, etc.
[edit on 18-4-2010 by EarthCitizen07]
Yeah. Okay. Did you get run out of business by Walmart or are you simply jumping on the anti-Walmart bandwagon because you have something in your craw about capitalism? Walmart is not "unfettered capitalism", in fact it's subject to plenty of government regulations.
To answer your contentions by number:
1. There are plenty of small businesses still thriving that have survived and will survive Walmart by finding new ways to compete.
2. Even the "lowest" Walmart employees are still subject to minimum wage and labor laws and are neither mistreated nor underpaid.
3. Companies go overseas for a variety of reasons and the vast majority of them have to do with terrible government policies, not Walmart.
Originally posted by Scarcer
Without a Walmart, you are likely to work in more locally owned businesses. You are also likelier to make more money. When Walmart moves in, you take advantage of the low prices. Businesses lose revenue and have to close. This lowers the standards and depletes work opportunities. Pretty soon your stuck with nothing but Walmart to shop or work at, which isn't good since work opportunities in Walmart are limited. This isn't theory, this has happened and continues to happen.