fast ufos in the sky over Niagra falls Canada April 13th, 2010, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 81 times


reply posted on 18-4-2010 @ 08:25 AM by ArMaP
reply to post by eaglewingz


I agree, their movements look like bat movements.

They can fly at relatively high altitudes and their movements depend on what they want to do: if they are trying to catch a moth they must move like the moth, so they have erratic movements, but when they are moving from their "home" to their hunting area they do not need to move erratically, they just go from point A to point B, unless they find an insect.

Also, as they are usually the size of a mouse, they do not need to be flying very high to appear like that to the camera. And as we don't know the altitude or the size of the objects we see in the video we cannot say at what speed they are travelling, it could be very high or relatively low.


reply posted on 18-4-2010 @ 08:28 AM by watchZEITGEISTnow
reply to post by ArMaP





scale is the word here. They are too fast AND too big to be bats!




reply posted on 18-4-2010 @ 08:35 AM by DJW001
reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow



reply to post by ArMaP




scale is the word here. They are too fast AND too big to be bats!


Precisely the point here. These could be mosquitoes six inches away from the lens of the camera.


reply posted on 18-4-2010 @ 08:56 AM by Chadwickus
reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow



No, perspective is the word here, they appear bigger than some of the stars, so with your logic, they must be actually bigger than those stars right?




reply posted on 18-4-2010 @ 09:10 AM by DJW001
reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow



Chadwickus stated the problem clearly. There are no visual reference points to determine the "lights'" altitude, therefore it is impossible to determine their size and speed. They could be vast orbs at the edge of the solar system travelling at enormous speed, or mosquitoes six inches from the camera. Personally, I'm leaning towards bats.

[edit on 18-4-2010 by DJW001]


reply posted on 18-4-2010 @ 09:45 AM by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by DJW001



DJW001.....

I agree.....here's the YT homepage of the guy who posted the video on YT.

www.youtube.com...

All he does is collect stuff that's been debunked for years & present it with no real analysis or critical thinking.

He also directs people to his Twitter page to quote "GET ALL THE LATEST IN UFO, CONSPIRACY, SPACE AND SCIENCE NEWS" unquote.

He'd be better off getting on ATS & learning a bit more about all this.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 18-4-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]



reply posted on 18-4-2010 @ 09:47 AM by Drexon
Originally posted by RedBird
Having watched the video I would guess that it's a bat hunting insects. They can rise to very high altitudes at night to hunt. Higher than you'd think.

A kite also sounds possible, but I think it's less likely. During the point when the object "stops and hovers for a second" (ie, moves towards the camera ) there is erratic side-to-side movement that makes it clear that this is no "heavy" craft, but rather something small that is fighting against wind currents and being buffeted about slightly as it flies.

In the end, the object moves to... organically. If it were a UFO I'd expect to see straight lines and sharp right angle turns. It would feel different. It would raise the hairs on the back of my neck, and the movements would be so precise that it would almost look photo shopped. That's what a real high-altitude UFO looks like - like it's putting on a show for you with its geometric patterns of movement.

This one doesn't look right to me at all. Sorry.

First off, this was shot in the middle of winter -15 (I think it was) celcius, so it can't be a bat. Second, can't you tell how zoomed in this is? The kite would have to be flying at long distance aircraft altitudes, also, how can you say that a UFO would be more likely to go in straight lines? Have you seen so many that you can give a professional opinion?

I'm sorry, but your argument fails on so many levels. You're entitled to your opinion of course, but they're, sorry, amateurish at best.


OK, that means you know their size, right?

The size isn't detectable, of course. The point is the speed and acceleration. Not even a fly could do what that thing does. As far as I'm concerned this is either a real live alien spacecraft or CGI.


[edit on 18-4-2010 by Drexon]


reply posted on 18-4-2010 @ 10:18 AM by DJW001
reply to post by jclmavg



The video maker intentionally did not supply crucial information. The video was taken with some sort of light amplification device, so we are looking at a digitized version of digitized information. We do not know if there was any magnification involved, and if so, whether it was optical or digital. We can only guess at the angular width of the field and the resolution of the images. As usual from this Niagara Falls UFO hunter, there is nothing to corroborate the event he is recording. It is not even clear when this video was taken, not even a time stamp. (Not that those can't be faked.)
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Egg found in Martian Meteorite
  Posted 18 days ago with 126 member flags
Ooparts and Ancient aliens
  Posted 2 days ago with 53 member flags
Bad Ufologists-Lets clean the closet of any skeletons
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
Death by UFO!
  Posted 15 days ago with 49 member flags
UFOs during Satellite launch
  Posted 10 days ago with 49 member flags
Tracey Taylor - "Aliens Gave Me a Special Gift"
  Posted 9 days ago with 31 member flags
DIVINE INTERVENTION: ETs Defeating Old World Order
  Posted 17 days ago with 29 member flags