posted on Feb, 10 2011 @ 07:32 PM
I can't rely on Flickr
(above post) to render a pic when needed.
Now here is what has been
happening since 2004 especially,but really long beforehand.The picture of the "Statue" in the press has a blacked out face.If NASA was truthful,they
would have corrected the black face pic with the real detailed face pics I'm presenting.Nasa ,you would think, would want to correct any
misunderstanding about their billions of dollars domain.Clarity,truthfulness,disclosure of information,scientific fact are what NASA should be all
about.No,you think wrongly,with your face blackened.Why the big black-face?Is your face DIRTY ? Wow ,I totally forgot what's in the Sandmarie's
lap,her pet snake.Ok The head is as big as hers.She may be about a foot tall for general scale.I can't see if her legs end in feet or she has a lower
snake body,but it seems the legs do split and are divided.Other samples could back this up later.But the snake in lap is not visible in the
black-faced pics because it's deliberately masked out.Look at the large eyes for comparison.The 2 subjects look toward Spirit rover.Having 2 not one
but 2 lifeforms embracing each other is a great shot.But Nasa blew it and covered up,stinking of a cover-up agenda denying life on Mars.How does the
black-face statue have such an uncomfortable POSE with the arm hanging in mid-air FOR NO REASON ? The head of the snake the arm is resting on has been
DELIBERATELY washed out,severely edited as a lie to deny that snake is even in the photo.When I designed the rovers,1987 I had no idea that 24 years
later I'd have to be explaining this stuff. People are blind,so it takes backtracking,persistence and backbone to present truth when it's too
uncomfortable or inconvenient for the NASA agenda.There's a bunch of side-tracking and misdirection like a magic show for the rubes.If you feel like
a MARK when NASA describes water on Mars still possible,please yawn very loudly.
edit on 10-2-2011 by vze2xjjk because: I actually think you
CAN handle the truth,and I would be insulting you to think otherwise.