It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In Common Law, impression on wax or other substance capable of being impressed. The purpose of a seal is to attest to the execution of an Instrument. The word seal and the letters L.S. (locus sigilli, place of the seal) have the same significance and today are commonly used for the same purpose.
The use of seals began at a time when writing was not common, but when every person of means possessed a coat-of-arms or other distinctive device. Great significance was attached to the use of seals as a means of distinguishing persons. With the spread of education, the signature on an instrument became more important than the seal, and seals lost their former dignity and importance.
Why can you not answer that? Why are you pretending it is not there?
You are taking all of this time to respond to me and yet none of it addresses the HUGE FLAWS IN YOUR IDEA.
I get it, you realize how stupid and weak your whole thing about sending a copy to everyone is and refuse to defend it now.
Fine. My post is there for you to respond to but you would rather do this. Obviously that is your way of saying "You got me on my whole rant and every idea I expressed so let me move on to the next thing you said nad just pretend it did not happen.
The funny thing is, I am all kinds of ready to respond to these nonsense posts as well but I refuse to just let you duck a real question like that.
Either you have something to really say and it can stand up to questioning or you are just a troll spouting off things. I guess if you respond one more time while still refusing to actually answer the questions about your farce, we will have our answer wont we.
Your idea is nonsense and cannot stand up to even the most basic of questions you pretend they were not asked and move along. That is as sad as it gets around here.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Now, I want to ask you something.
Do you understand Prima Facie law?
According to the COLB, it is Prima Facie evidence that Obama was born where he claims, in Hawai'i.
Is there any real proof he was born anywhere else that could be used in a court of law to refute the prima facie evidence held in the COLB that everyone has seen online?
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by K J Gunderson
You are wasting my time and if you can't accept the answer I have given you that is your problem.
People are not stupid and can read these posts for themselves, and will know I did answer your questions, you just simply refused to accept those as answers.
You took a poster who had little investment in the issue, certainly not the creator of this thread, and chose to take up argument with him, and what have you proved?
Have you managed to settle the issue?
Try taking a lesson from the most admirable and esteemed member Whatuknow, who instead of playing such stupid games simply did his best to settle the issue.
There is a man worth admiring and if one has to have an opponent, that man is a worthy one. You sir, are wasting my time.
Originally posted by gaslaugh123
reply to post by kinda kurious
Then please give us proof of his eligibility as I have had to do so many times (retired military officer). Why so much hiding of something so constitutional. Everything about this man reeks of dead promises and constant lying. How sick does sick have to be before individuals wake up. I guess "sick as hell".
I am afraid First, you will have to provide me with the specific law that states that you are entitled to have a copy of Obama's COLB. Secondly, you will have to provide for me verifiable proof that you are a document expert that can make the determination in open court whether or not the document you intend to have possession of is in fact legitimate or not.
Thirdly, assuming that you are able to get a hold of a certified copy of the COLB as depicted by FactCheck.org thus proving the Prima Facie Evidence that Obama was indeed born in Hawai'i thus satisfying his jus soli requirement under the Constitution for his Natural Born Citizenship status, you would have to bring up evidence of your own that refutes the Prima Facie Evidence provided by the COLB.
Otherwise, it's would appear that it's a grand case of extortion being perpetrated on the POTUS by a group of individuals who have conspired together to attempt to blackmail the POTUS into resigning his presidency based on this ignorant theory. That is the intent of birthers, they wish for Obama to resign his presidency based on the theory (still unproven) that he was born in Kenya instead of Hawai'i as he has claimed.
To your first assertion I would point to The Constitution of the United States of America, a powerful law indeed. In fact, so powerful is this law, it is known as the Supreme Law of the Land.
Do you have a problem with that Wuk?
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Originally posted by joey_hv
... respectable BIRTHER! ...