posted on Apr, 4 2013 @ 06:24 PM
Originally posted by DISRAELI
reply to post by works4dhs
I agree that these things tend to run together in history, and I said more about that in my other thread "Four Horsemen running" (which was a badly
chosen last-minute title change of what should have been "Four Horsemen- how?")
Howver, I see reasons for going with the older view that the first one is "Pestilence" or "Plague".
Otherwise, for one thing, the first two are too similar.
so I was thinking first a spirit of conflict before the actual war. WWII is classic example of this seqence.
so your theory is that the pestilence/plague is the first horse, and comes before the war/famine/death?
I'm wondering under what circumstances disease could cause a war and really can't...unless maybe someone like Nork is threatening bio war and somebody
(Souk, US) pre-empts?
would it be possible some plague comes that needs a substance or material to cure, and the holder of the substance/cure doesn't want to share,
resulting in force?
I can easily see armageddon as China/India ('Kings of the East') marching west to the oil fields owned by Islam (revived caliphate?). our whole
civilisation is based on cheap petroleum. absolute must-have. (supposed a new caliphate requires whole countries to submit to Allah to buy the
edit on 4-4-2013 by works4dhs because: typo
edit on 4-4-2013 by works4dhs because: (no reason given)
4-4-2013 by works4dhs because: add thought