If I could flag this a 100x, I would. Great catch with the Public Intelligence getting the removal notice!! This is very, very disturbing and
important. Link for that: publicintelligence.net...
But why May 13th? If they do it, they want to do it at the beginning of the week's news cycle .
Operation Eagle Horizon (phoenix reference) is May 17 - 19. Obama has gone from "scheduled" tests/ exercises to "no- notice" tests, cancelling the
location of Las Vegas and now to be held at an undisclosed location.
Since "they" know that we know about their use of training exercises in conjunction with false flags (due to making exercises "no-notice"), we can
assume it will NOT be on those specific dates, but in a timeframe close to it so as to have plausibe cover that they are not correlated. My guess is
before, by a week or so. If they do it before Monday May 17, strong dates would be May 3rd Monday, May 4th Tuesday and May 10th, 11th MON, Tues.
My own guess is Los Angeles, with an anthrax attack, not a nuke attack. A nuclear attack just doesn't serve their interests as efficiently as an
anthrax attack (conditioning the masses to be mass vaccinated/ mass medical countermeasure compliant when the inevitable bird flu and swine flu
recombination cover story in 2012 is unveiled, by the distribution of anthrax vaccine and antibiotic dispensing and also to get funding to build the
"health" infrastructure needed to achieve nation wide vaccination). My thread on this topic:
I'm imagining that the storyline will be Al Queda teams up with US militias in Riverside and they travel to nearby Los Angeles. From a dead news
link from my thread:
Al-Qaida's American-born spokesman on Sunday called on Muslims serving in the U.S. armed forces to emulate the Army major charged with killing 13
people in Fort Hood. [...] Gadahn grew up on a goat farm in Riverside County, California, and converted to Islam at a mosque in nearby Orange County.
"You shouldn't make the mistake of thinking that military bases are the only high-value targets in America and the West. On the contrary, there are
countless other strategic places, institutions and installations which, by striking, the Muslim can do major damage," he said, an assault rifle
leaning up against a wall next to him. [...] In the latest video, Gadahn said those planning attacks did not need to use only firearms like Hasan, but
could use other weapons. "As the blessed operations of September 11th showed, a little imagination and planning and a limited budget can turn almost
anything into a deadly, effective and convenient weapon."
In what manner would they disperse the anthrax? The great propaganda mouthpiece Huffington Post just posted the "hypothetical" scenario.
Never mind. The weapon will be a state-of-the-art agricultural sprayer launched from the countryside. It will fly at 229 m.p.h. and spray 660 gallons
of liquid that in a single pass might cover as much as three square miles of cityscape. The aim is to spread inhalational anthrax through the
population below. But first, the terrorist needs to overcome many huge obstacles just to launch the attack. The amount of anthrax required to cause
even the radically fewer fatalities we arrive at below would dwarf two to four pounds - that small an amount would result in few fatalities. Thanks to
well designed experiments based on worldwide, decades-long agricultural spraying using a harmless relative of anthrax we have data to calculate what
he will need and how he must use it. Modern crop "dusters" deliver only liquids, so the killing power must come from sprayed droplets that by
chance remain suspended as an extremely fine mist and are breathed in by those on the ground. Most drops will fall without much effect. To achieve the
required dosage of deadly Ames strain anthrax the spores must be suspended in liquid so finely that their clumps are no larger than five microns --
smaller than a red blood cell - and it will take 115 pounds of those spores, not four.
Where does he get a deadly anthrax strain? The only likely place: Fort Detrick, Maryland, source of the spores that killed five people and left two
dozen permanently injured in the "Amerithrax" letter attacks of October, 2001. The anthrax in those letters reportedly was enough to kill many
thousands of people -- under ideal conditions -- and those spores were almost certainly stolen by a lab insider with access. If a few grams were
stolen, how could anyone handle such deadly pathogens and culture them from a few stolen grams into 115 pounds -- then weaponize them to the
sophisticated degree that even the Amerithrax powder was not. How will the payload spores be kept from clumping in the tanks as they naturally do?
Beyond the five-micron size limit they will not penetrate deeply into the victims' lungs; few infections will follow.
No matter. Given: the terrorist is airborne with this most improbable cargo. Now the spores are released. At 229 m.p.h, it would take only four to
five minutes for the "duster" to unload over three square miles. If the terrorist can get from takeoff to target without detection by air defense -
what are the odds? -- he may be able to cover that area before being shot down. Everyone in the drop zone, of course, must be out in the open and fail
to notice an aircraft only 60 yards overhead spraying mist, and they must fail to seek medical treatment. Inhalational anthrax is treatable if caught
early. Again, no matter. Given: they all have been so exposed. Under these ideal conditions, which stretch even the most fearful imagination, we
calculate the maximum death toll at 3,100.
I know, not a staggering death toll (but coincidentally the same number for 9-11...), but that isn't the point, which is control, a brief taste of
martial law, and a mass medical countermeasure distribution.
And they get to say that American thought criminals are in league with Al Queda. Can they get to say that with a nuclear attack? No.