posted on Apr, 16 2010 @ 02:15 AM
Forty years ago, I had a freaky time with a ouija board, soon followed by automatic writing, a period when I wrote 2 short 'books'. I took them to a
psychiatrist in Oxford who concluded that I personally didn't write this, i.e. that it was channelled material. In writing this thread, the content
of the stuff that came out isn't important so much as the source. Today, I can't channel, not like I did 40 years ago, which is probably just as
well. Today, everybody else does! But what do they get? What comes out? What REALLY is in their heart? Is it the truth? Is it their imagination? Or is
it the gabble of one of the 'false prophets' speaking out in these debatable 'End times'? Below is a portion from an article by Laura Knight of
www.cassiopaea.org taken from the Wave section, chapter 10.
I'd be interested to know if any ATS members have experienced the channelling problems mentioned below:
"The question then arises: can and do "benevolent" sources at other levels of reality LIE?
I can hear the sharp gasps of horror and negation at this statement. I realize that many people have had "channeling experiences" with beings of
"love and light" who infuse every word, every contact, every interaction with insuperable sensations of "love and well-being," which amounts to
"proof" that their source is a truly "higher" being(s). And then, how often have I heard the story from hypnosis subjects who have come to me for
help, telling me that when they began their channeling experiments, performing the prescribed exercises of "surrounding the self with love and
light" and "calling on my guides and higher self for protection," the resulting contacts and information were "transcendent" and truly "love
oriented;" and then something "went wrong?" Something turned around and there were energy drains, the messages that initially were so positive and
beautiful soon became "oddly"different or "off key." In some cases, it turns ugly and intervention is necessary. In others, the percipient is
convinced that they must "suffer" the side-effects for the sake of "the work," and no intervention is desired. But at the same time they wanted me
to "fix" their stress problems or help them work on their energy levels, or find out if the "real" problem was in THEM, their past lives, or
anything other than the fact that they were hooked up with vampiric "guides."
Sometimes the percipient doesn't have such problems as this. The problem becomes apparent in other ways. Their source tells them that they are
"special" or "chosen" in some way - that they are really a "great teacher" who is a "walk-in" or an "incarnation" who was stimulated to
"awaken" on the day they serendipitously decided to "channel my higher self." They are given "titles," such as "Lord Ramananda" or "Lady
Krishnagupa" or whatever. They are given to know that they are to be the new purveyors of the long hidden science of "Keyturn" or whatever, and the
dance begins. The words pour forth in awesome syntactical matrices of great profundity and beneficence. And all the listeners agree that they are
somehow "changed" or "uplifted and inspired" by the presence of so great a master in their midst. They follow the teachings, invest their time and
money in predicted events of "mass landings" or "photon belts" or cometary companions who are going to airlift them to glory, and then - what? The
predicted rapture goes kaflooey, and the "excuses" begin in an effort to find someone or something to blame for the disappointment. "
I would add that, from what I've read, discarnate communications often contradict one another, i.e. entities on the other side always have an axe to
grind, are in fact just the same as many here on our side, i.e. LIE.
In fact, deceivers of themselves.