It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Months after President Obama urged federal agencies last year to cut wasteful spending, the U.S. Department of State paid $3,814 to fill an order of Jack Daniel's whiskey for gratuities at one of its many overseas embassies.
The booze buy wasn't unusual.
Last year alone [2009], the State Department sent taxpayers tabs totaling nearly $300,000 for alcoholic beverages — about twice as much compared to the previous year [2008], according to an analysis of spending records by The Washington Times.
Taxpayer watchdogs say while accounting for a small fraction of the State Department's overall budget, some of the liquor expenditures reflect larger concerns about stewardship of federal tax dollars at a time when many recession-weary Americans find themselves struggling to hold onto jobs and pay mortgages.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
why the heck would booze expenses nearly DOUBLE from 2008-2009 when we are supposed to be cutting back?
Originally posted by groingrinder
There is NO REASON for any entity of the US Government to have a bill for liquor. We do not pay them to drink, but apparently they perceive otherwise.
Originally posted by Doc Velocity
Originally posted by groingrinder
There is NO REASON for any entity of the US Government to have a bill for liquor. We do not pay them to drink, but apparently they perceive otherwise.
What I find highly unusual is that the Federal bar tab DOUBLED in the same year that Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) died.
You would think that, after Teddy died, the alcoholic consumption in Washington would be cut in half... because Ted Kennedy was consuming the other half when he was alive.
Originally posted by groingrinder
There is NO REASON for any entity of the US Government to have a bill for liquor. We do not pay them to drink, but apparently they perceive otherwise.