Originally posted by AlwaysQuestion
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Fascinating... you make very easy reading and if you don't already do so suggest you go down the author route.... I would easily sit back and loose a few hours reading your work.
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Take It or Leave It
If the Income Tax were allowable in the united states of America, it would have been instituted July 4, 1776. If the Income Tax were allowable in Texas, it would have been instituted March 5, 1836.
Two things make you subject to the income tax:
The Social Security Number and Use of the Zip Code
Just as there are two united states: the UNITED STATES democracy corporation and the united states of America the republic of we the people; there are two post offices: the United States Post Office and the United States Postal Service. The United States Post Office is non-domestic (see DMM 122.32 as amended) and is for "we the people" outside of the federal territories, whereas the United States Postal Service is domestic, is for government use and is for federal territories. Whenever you use zip codes, you are stating that you live in a federal territory or that you are living in a state as a federal employee or citizen subject to all of the codes, rules and regulations of the federal corporation. General delivery seems to be the best way to get your mail, as some suggest that the use of an address or post box also grants federal jurisdiction. You are not a USPS customer, so you do not have to fill out a USPS Form to Request General Delivery nor is general delivery only available for 30 days as the USPS will tell you, because again, you are not a customer, you are a transient - just a passing through.
It is alright for you to use the social security number and to receive benefits, as long as you do so as the agent for the fiction via the redemption process.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is NOT an agency of the government. The IRS came into the United States through the Bretton-Woods Agreement. It operates on the premise that someone has said they owe money to the IRS and the IRS is allowed to collect it.
The American people have been turned up side down by the premise to self assess and to voluntarily comply via payments made under the penalty of perjury. This is the only self-assessment and voluntary compliance of any taxation placed upon the American people. When you self-assess your own taxes and voluntarily comply under the penalty of perjury, you have become an IRS agent against yourself and subject to Section 6065 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Section 6065 of the Internal Revenue Code states:
(1) Verification of returns. Except as otherwise provided by the Secretary, any return, declaration, statement, or other document required to be made under any provision of the Internal Revenue laws or regulations shall contain or be verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury.
There are many valid arguments about: the definition of income, Title 26 never having been properly ratified and passed into positive law and that Americans cannot be directly taxed on their private property compensation. These are all true, but they don't matter because if you have a bank account, you have agreed to follow all of the rules and regulations of the bank. One of those rules is Title 26! Your signature card is your contract with the IRS as it says that you agree to abide by all the rules and regulations of the
Very well done, as you know I do not pay taxes and have told the IRS where they can put it. If you know the magic language, it is easy to see how to get out. But do people have the werewithall to do it themselves? Not many. It is THIS fear that TPTB rely on to make their plans work. If people would only take a stand and say NO MORE, we would all be done with this crap.
Originally posted by BrianInRI
Thank You for this well thought out, detailed and researched thread. It's something I was considering doing myself, but I have neither the talent nor credibilty to make it happen. Sometimes, like lately, I just feel like throwing my hands up and walking away. It's threads like this that reignite my hope and faith. Keep up the good work knowing that you are makeing a difference in peoples lives and helping them fight back against tyranny and oppression. &
Something to remember: if you think that this is preposterous, it might be because your school age indoctrination worked so well. Any child who bucks the system is quickly "fixed", either by beating them into submission or medicating them into a stupor.
Originally posted by Icarus Rising
There's just one word in the preamble to the Treaty of Paris that I am stuck on: hearts.
Does this word in its plural suppose Prince George to have more than one heart, or is it meant to separate at the comma after etc. ending his titles, him from the hearts of those representing the United States of America, and in doing so render them completely singular entities? Taking out all the extra titles, the sentence would read:
"It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, and of the United States of America,"
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by daddio
It all stops with people wanting to learn, accepting the truth, and then daring to be free.
The welfare state in America isn't to or for the poor, the welfare state in America, is to and for the rich!
Thanks for posting my friend.
Keep spreading the word!
The Promissory Note To Pay Our Debts
HJR-192 of June 5, 1933 is the promissory note (the promise of Abraham) the government issued to balance the exchange to credit the people. The Promissory note is on the debit side of the United States Governments ledger, which was a debited from their credit, created by the Executive Order of April 5, 1933 when they took the gold out of circulation. Public Policy is rooted in HJR-192 and is Grace that creates our exemption. This is your temporal saving grace. Under grace, the law falls away to create a more perfect contract. Public Policy removed the people's liability to make all payments by making a contract null if it required the payment to be in substance, because the people didn't have any money to pay with. All that must be done now is to discharge the liability. Pay and discharge are similar words but the principles are as different as Old and New Testaments. The word "pay" is equated with gold and silver, or something of substance like a first-born lamb, which requires tangible work to be invested in it to remove the liability because an execution must occur. The word "Discharge" is equated with paper, or even more basic, simple credits and debits, that exist on paper only, like the slate held by the agents/angels of heaven that get swiped clean. You cannot pay a bill with a bill and you cannot pay a debt with a debt. What HJR-192 did was, remove the liability of an obligor (someone obligated to pay a debt) by making it against Public Policy to pay debts. All that needs to be done now is discharge the debit with an appropriate credit "dollar for dollar." Debt must be discharged dollar for dollar in the same sense, as sin was discharged on the Cross. The moment a debt exists, it must be written off. The catch is, we can't write off the debt because we are not in possession of the account in deficit; our fiduciary agent is in possession of the account so we must provide him with the tax return (by the return of the original offer) so the fiduciary can discharge the liability through their internal revenue service (the bookkeeper). Most feel that when the money was taken out of society, the people became the slaves, this is not true, the people were freed from every obligation that society could create thus freeing the people from any obligation which they may incur simply because we cannot pay a debt. Ask yourself the question, What are you charging me with? And how do you expect Me to pay? Simply said, there is no money, plain and simple for me to make the payment with and on top of that, if I were to pay, who is paying Me to pay that guy and who's paying that guy and so on... Public Policy is the supercedious bond because it limits our liability to pay. It is the more perfect contract because it operates on grace to pay our debts after we have done all that we can. We go as far as we can to fulfill the obligation (acceptance and tax return) and after we have done all we can, mercy and grace kick in being our exemption to make the payment. Grace creates our exemption in the industrial society so long as we accept the charge.
It's always better to let people think they are free, letting them get on with their life... whilst making sure to create those circumstances that dictate that same life is continuously spent in topping up your 'owner's' coffers.
We are basically the human equivalent of free range chickens
Trouble is all lifestock needs culling occasionally ... I think we are due for a worldwide cull (WW3) in the not too distant future.
Great thread PT
Originally posted by zzombie
Awesome Thread S&F ! thanks for adding a few more details to the picture.
No doubt that the Holy Roman Empire also created biblical concepts that control masses through the religion of guilt an fear.
Looking forward to the day we celebrate "world freedom day"