It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ab2tw
Apart from abortionists and the wholesalers who traffic in aborted baby parts (see story, page 34), who stands to profit from this fetal research?
Routinely, the women would go into labour before the final surgery. �They were coming out alive,� says Kelly. Aside from the incident with the twins, she says, there were three to four live births in a typical two-week period. �The doctor would either break the neck or take a pair of tongs and basically beat the fetus until it was dead.�
Originally posted by AmethystWolf
�The doctor would either break the neck or take a pair of tongs and basically beat the fetus until it was dead.�
IMO, this is totally sensationalist and intentionally inflammatory pro life propaganda. Does anyone really think the doctor would beat the infant with tongs when he could quietly cover it's nose and mouth?
Originally posted by RANT
Alzhiemer's sufferers like Ronald Reagen.
Parkinsons sufferers like Michael J. Fox.
Paralysis sufferers like Chistopher Reeve.
Our grandparents.
Our parents.
You.
Me.
Our children.
And every generation of humanity to come.
Originally posted by mpeake
Even if this is a form of propaganda for pro life, and only just a bit of this is true, how can you have no other response other than disgust?!?!
Originally posted by ab2tw
Are you saying that the activities in the article never occuer, or that you are ok with using "terminated" newborns for medical research?