It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Tea Party support for (R) Scott Brown Pays off , for Democrats

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 09:52 AM
link   
news.yahoo.com...

When are people going to open their eyes! There are two partys and ONE agenda!

Elected officials are Are either Dino's or Rino's, GET IT !
Get involved and KNOW who you are voting for!

When Scott Brown scored his upset victory in January's special election to fill Edward Kennedy's Senate seat, panicked Democratic Party insiders assumed the sky was falling. Brown's election as the newest senator from Massachusetts meant that the Democrats had lost their razor-thin 60-vote majority to counter GOP filibuster threats on major legislation.

What's more, the symbolism couldn't have looked worse for Democrats: Here was the seat held by the Senate's late liberal lion, in one of the bluest states on the electoral map, falling into the Republican column. Activists from the small-government Tea Party movement had flooded the state with volunteers to get out the vote and claim this critical Senate seat as a prize pick-up for the anti-Democratic, anti-Obama insurgency. Election watchers even started talking about the "Scott Brown effect," as polling started to look grim for other established liberal lawmakers from traditionally deep blue states, like California Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer.

But barely three months into his tenure, Brown has fallen out of favor with his onetime Tea Party backers, and is starting to looking like something of a silver lining for Democrats. In a no-less symbolic moment, Brown declined an invitation to appear at a Tea Party rally in Boston this week headlined by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

Brown cited pressing legislative business as the reason for his no-show--but his fledgling legislative record is precisely what has conservative activists so angry at him. On Monday, he furnished a critical swing vote to tamp down a threatened Republican filibuster on a bill to extend federal unemployment benefits. And in his first major break with conservative activists, he voted for a Democratic jobs bill in February, earning him thousands of outraged comments on his Facebook page from Tea Party backers who felt betrayed by the senator they had worked so hard to help elect. Both votes have also helped Senate Democrats make the case that they are hammering together bipartisan support on important legislation — something that's been an elusive goal in dealing with the filibuster-happy GOP Senate minority.

Even on health care reform — the issue that Brown's election was supposed to help derail — the big GOP turnaround in Massachusetts created a certain "scared straight" effect among key Democratic congressional leaders. In order to stem the rising tide of conservative discontent, Democrats simply chose to bear down and get the health care legislation passed. And the loss of the 60-vote majority also simplified the decision-making for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and other top Senate Democrats going forward. Being forced to adopt the budget-driven tactic of reconciliation to win approval on a 50-plus majority was oddly liberating for Senate leaders who had sweated out no end of unsavory deals to get wavering centrist lawmakers on board for the initial Senate health care vote last December.

"If you already paid the bill, you may as well enjoy the meal," is how one Democratic operative describes the thinking of senior Democrats after the Brown upset.

As for Brown, his votes supporting Democratic initiatives are just part of his coming to full awareness of what it means to serve as a GOP senator representing a heavily Democratic state. The operative says: "It's Brown's yearning for re-election that's benefited Democrats. His votes are moving an agenda forward but have added more suspicion amongst Tea Partiers that they can't trust Republicans." And that creates an additional bind for Brown as he serves out the remainder of his term. "After all [Brown's] bluster during the campaign, his votes now come off as more calculated than principled. That will turn off moderates — who are even more critical after Brown took all the energy out of the base that got him elected."




posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 10:12 AM
link   
Has anyone ever stopped to think that Scott Brown may really be a politician who has the concern of the people as his top priority and not Political parties???



posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 10:25 AM
link   
reply to post by OLD HIPPY DUDE
 


Nice SPIN.

No matter how much of a RINO Scott Brown turns out to be, it couldn't be worse than the dyed in the wool Martha (Marsha) Coakley.

BTW Republicans are still laughing that we took over "The Kennedy Seat". No amount of SPIN can deflect from that.




posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 10:29 AM
link   
The tea party is a national movement...but voting is not done nationally, they are done by their districts...this isn't a democracy.

You also must understand that the tea party people are not the natives of the countys...they are being shipped all around by corporate interests...like a herd of cattle being loaded up and delivered from state to state.

They were expecting over 10k people today in Boston to listen to palin...they got about 2-3k...most of them out of towners

But of course the media is flocked to it for some reason...

The surface is not the representation of the true movement, and I think I understand whats happening here...brilliant move...but wont leap to conclusion until november.



posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 05:38 PM
link   
reply to post by OLD HIPPY DUDE
 


In reality.. he's just trying to distance himself from that media whore Palin. Any "tea party" with her as the centerpiece is a laughing stock. And it was more so the grass roots movement that got Brown elected.



posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 06:34 PM
link   
reply to post by SaturnFX
 


I'd say the conclusion is this Palin tea party express thing is the Republican Party hijacking the Tea Party movement.. I don't think it is working though.. the "tea party'ers" that are showing up, would never show up at an actual tea party event.. they are Republicans through and through, and they attend because the likes of Rush tell them to.

I know when I attended the one tea party event I could go to, there was some very, very strong anti-Republican chatter, as well as anti-Democrat. Actually, it was pretty much anti Government.



new topics

top topics
 
0

log in

join