Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
yes, demand. you said yourself "it takes two", why then do you deny the man's right to his child?
FIRST - - you wanted to deny monetary compensation for a viable human being following birth. Your thoughts obviously are not with the welfare of the
child. Therefore - I would flat out deny you the child.
SECOND - - you blamed the woman.
With this sexist antiquated mindset - - YOU want ME to take you seriously on the rights of the sperm donor?
OH WOW SHOCKING - - I give rights to the woman. And OF COURSE - - I'm sure she must be one of those bitchy feminists.
As I said - - which you so casually label as "its not the norm" - - there have been relationships where the woman carried the child and the father
took full responsibility after its birth.
Again - if men like you are truly 100% serious - then I want to see you legislate mandatory DNA paternity and mandatory child support for every single
pregnancy/child.
Until then - - you have nothing but quick sand to stand on.
wow. you obviously haven't been reading anything i've said. i've already stated that i think men should pay for their children. i was merely
pointing out how hypocritical it is to demand them to pay, yet deny them the right to have any choice in whether to abort or keep the child.
"sperm donor" ya..i don't think im the sexist one here. let me say it again, i believe the sexes to be equal, and denying men rights to their child
is sexist (unless the a court has found that he is an unfit father or detrimental influence).
"I stated (my belief) - - viable physical being - - begins at physical birth. Not before. "
yes, and i said that just because you believe something, it doesn't make it true. which you STILL have not tried to refute. so once more for the
record, i'll have to try. if you don't try to argue the point, then you are blatantly cherry-picking.
do you think our stopping the holocaust was wrong? do you think a man can rape as many women as he wants and walk free simply because he believes it
is ok? MORAL AND ETHICAL LAW IS NOT RELATIVE! all things being equal, what is wrong for one person is equally wrong for another person.
what makes more sense-
babies grow in the womb without a soul until they fall out of the woman's vagina and miraculously has a person inside the body now, OR,
is the soul there from conception until they die?
21 days after conception there is a heartbeat, in a closed circulatory system, with a blood type that is different from the mother's.
"Until then - - you have nothing but quick sand to stand on."
sooo... you're basically saying "until i get guaranteed money from the father, he has no say in if i have HIS child killed"
"Therefore - I would flat out deny you the child."
i actually said the opposite of what you claim i said, then you say you have the authority to to tell me whether or not i have any rights to the
child?
mmmmmmmmmmmmmm...seems quite "crazy feminist" to me. i don't know why you hate men so much, maybe you were abused or raped and im sorry, but i want
the best for children everywhere, and that means trying to keep them alive. but of course you don't believe that.