Neb. governor signs landmark abortion bills, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 08:30 PM by Annee
Originally posted by Jovi1
Originally posted by Annee


Both are fully responsible for the ACT of creating a living physical being. Therefore - both are equally responsible for the financial aspect of that physical beings needs.


Unfortunately your right but if your going to penalize a man financially because the woman decides to keep said child then he should have the right to demand that said child be carried to term and given custody of if he so chose.


The relationship between the man and woman - will determine if both have a say so in keeping or aborting. There have been cases where the parents agreed to full term and the father took full custody and responsibility.


However this is not the norm.


The high percentage of men who abandon women who become pregnant is ridiculous. As a woman - I really have no sympathy for man complaining about abortion. NONE ZERO.


Unfortunately this is all too often the case and is a large part of the problem in our society.

And I have no sympathy for woman who uses poor judgment and gets pregnant, really in this day and age if your too stupid to use birth control your to stupid to be having sex to begin with. I am all prochoice as long as your making that choice before you decide to be a whore and spread your legs.


DEMAND?!?!?

When DNA Paternity testing becomes mandatory by law - - then talk to me.

If you are a real man - - then start legislation on mandatory DNA Paternity testing.

Poor judgment?? Dude - it takes two. WOW! Oh How Surprising - - once again it is the woman's fault and responsibility.

In this day and age - - nothing except complete abstinence is foolproof.

Please read before you post.


reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 08:33 PM by Bob Sholtz
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
what i hate about all of this is that the guy doesn't get any say, because the woman will say "its my body, i can do whatever i want with it" but if the guy has money, after the baby is born, hes gonna foot some of the bill, so how is that fair? the guy being forced to pay for a child when he didn't have a say in keeping him/her or not. sure, its in the girls body, but it isn't her body, and it takes two.



Both are fully responsible for the ACT of creating a living physical being. Therefore - both are equally responsible for the financial aspect of that physical beings needs.

The relationship between the man and woman - will determine if both have a say so in keeping or aborting. There have been cases where the parents agreed to full term and the father took full custody and responsibility.

The high percentage of men who abandon women who become pregnant is ridiculous. As a woman - I really have no sympathy for man complaining about abortion. NONE ZERO.



ya, both are responsible for the act, so why do women have the final say in whether the baby is killed or not? don't get me wrong, i believe 100% that if its yours, you need to help support it, but it is illogical and wrong to deny males LEGAL rights to an unborn baby.



"2. Each person is entitled to their own belief.

3. Forcing your belief on another is not OK."

there are absolutes in life, which means that no matter your take on the issue, there is a right and wrong. you didn't tell me if its ok for me to key your car, or a man to rape women because he "believes" its ok. most murderers have no qualms against killing, so going by your world view, we aren't allowed to tell them they can't murder, and we aren't allowed to punish them. or rapists.

was it ok for us to intervene in nazi germany where jews and many others were murdered? the nazi's believed that they should be exterminated, who are we to tell them any different.

see? such rhetoric falls apart when you try to put it into play. which again suggestes you addopted the beliefs you have now so they would allow you the ability to abort a child without it contradicting your beliefs. its what humans do, we are good at lieing to ourselves.



reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 08:58 PM by Bob Sholtz
reply to post by Annee



"DEMAND?!?!?

When DNA Paternity testing becomes mandatory by law - - then talk to me.

If you are a real man - - then start legislation on mandatory DNA Paternity testing.

Poor judgment?? Dude - it takes two. WOW! Oh How Surprising - - once again it is the woman's fault and responsibility.

In this day and age - - nothing except complete abstinence is foolproof.

Please read before you post."

yes, demand. you said yourself "it takes two", why then do you deny the man's right to his child?

i think the sexes are equal, so playing the feminist card has no effect on me. as i've said before, both parents share equal responsibility, but YOU want MORE rights for WOMEN. how can you force a guy to pay when you deny him all rights to his child?

on dna testing-i think it is a good idea to make the guy get tested to see if he is the father, but males getting the same amount of say in whether to keep or kill the child is more important. it isn't "your body" it is a seperate creature on a closed circulatory system.

it is grossly unfair to allow the woman full choice over whether to keep or kill the child, AND allow her to keep testing guys until she finds the father, and make him pay.


reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 09:00 PM by Bob Sholtz
reply to post by Annee



ugh. here you go again with the "well thats what you believe, not what i believe" stuff. i've already pointed out how that isn't a valid or logical system of thought. just because you believe the sky is green doesn't make it true.


reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 09:04 PM by Annee
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
reply to
post by Annee



ugh. here you go again with the "well thats what you believe, not what i believe" stuff. i've already pointed out how that isn't a valid or logical system of thought. just because you believe the sky is green doesn't make it true.


You Pointed Out!!!

HA HA HA HA LOL LOL LOL ROFLOL ROFLOL ROFLOL


reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 10:36 PM by walsbg22
reply to post by Annee



Jeez, just wanted to know. when does it go from destroying cells to murder, I don't really know but late-term is killing to me but just asking a more pro-choice person their opinion.

[edit on 14-4-2010 by walsbg22]



reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 10:44 PM by kozmo
reply to post by Annee



Rationalize it anyway you'd like. Trick yourself, fool yourself, use circular logic, bank on fallacious arguments... whatever. Doesn't matter to me in the least. I'm not the one who has to pay for YOUR sins. I'm also not the one who you will stand before to receive your final judgement.

Soooooooo... good luck rationalizing the whole baby killing thing, I guess.


reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 10:46 PM by Annee
Originally posted by walsbg22
reply to
post by Annee



Jeez, just wanted to know. when does it go from destroying cells to murder, I don't really know but late-term is killing to me but just asking a more pro-choice person their opinion.



Again - depends on what you believe. If you believe destroying physical cells is murder - then yes it is murder.

Why? Because you are intentionally committing an act you believe is killing/murder.

I happen to believe we are energy beings - - that physical is an illusion. A thought created world.

You can not kill an energy being/soul. You can only stop the process of them having that particular physical experience. That being/soul may not be real happy with you denying their experience - - - but in no way is it murder.


reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 10:49 PM by Annee
Originally posted by kozmo
reply to
post by Annee



Rationalize it anyway you'd like. Trick yourself, fool yourself, use circular logic, bank on fallacious arguments... whatever. Doesn't matter to me in the least. I'm not the one who has to pay for YOUR sins. I'm also not the one who you will stand before to receive your final judgement.

Soooooooo... good luck rationalizing the whole baby killing thing, I guess.


Dude -- your belief is yours.

And - - all these thoughts and judgments you put forward are yours.

Your belief - - is completely 100% irrelevant to me. It literally means nothing.


reply posted on 15-4-2010 @ 09:28 PM by Bob Sholtz
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz

yes, demand. you said yourself "it takes two", why then do you deny the man's right to his child?



FIRST - - you wanted to deny monetary compensation for a viable human being following birth. Your thoughts obviously are not with the welfare of the child. Therefore - I would flat out deny you the child.

SECOND - - you blamed the woman.

With this sexist antiquated mindset - - YOU want ME to take you seriously on the rights of the sperm donor?

OH WOW SHOCKING - - I give rights to the woman. And OF COURSE - - I'm sure she must be one of those bitchy feminists.

As I said - - which you so casually label as "its not the norm" - - there have been relationships where the woman carried the child and the father took full responsibility after its birth.

Again - if men like you are truly 100% serious - then I want to see you legislate mandatory DNA paternity and mandatory child support for every single pregnancy/child.

Until then - - you have nothing but quick sand to stand on.










wow. you obviously haven't been reading anything i've said. i've already stated that i think men should pay for their children. i was merely pointing out how hypocritical it is to demand them to pay, yet deny them the right to have any choice in whether to abort or keep the child.

"sperm donor" ya..i don't think im the sexist one here. let me say it again, i believe the sexes to be equal, and denying men rights to their child is sexist (unless the a court has found that he is an unfit father or detrimental influence).

"I stated (my belief) - - viable physical being - - begins at physical birth. Not before. "

yes, and i said that just because you believe something, it doesn't make it true. which you STILL have not tried to refute. so once more for the record, i'll have to try. if you don't try to argue the point, then you are blatantly cherry-picking.

do you think our stopping the holocaust was wrong? do you think a man can rape as many women as he wants and walk free simply because he believes it is ok? MORAL AND ETHICAL LAW IS NOT RELATIVE! all things being equal, what is wrong for one person is equally wrong for another person.

what makes more sense-

babies grow in the womb without a soul until they fall out of the woman's vagina and miraculously has a person inside the body now, OR,

is the soul there from conception until they die?

21 days after conception there is a heartbeat, in a closed circulatory system, with a blood type that is different from the mother's.

"Until then - - you have nothing but quick sand to stand on."

sooo... you're basically saying "until i get guaranteed money from the father, he has no say in if i have HIS child killed"


"Therefore - I would flat out deny you the child."

i actually said the opposite of what you claim i said, then you say you have the authority to to tell me whether or not i have any rights to the child?
mmmmmmmmmmmmmm...seems quite "crazy feminist" to me. i don't know why you hate men so much, maybe you were abused or raped and im sorry, but i want the best for children everywhere, and that means trying to keep them alive. but of course you don't believe that.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



While we were Distracted with Gay Marriage news This happend today
  Posted 18 days ago with 81 member flags
People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 3 days ago with 70 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 13 days ago with 26 member flags
President Obama Affirms His Support for Same Sex Marriage
  Posted 18 days ago with 24 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 6 days ago with 24 member flags
Police Tasings Might Finally Be Ruled Brutality
  Posted 12 days ago with 23 member flags