It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jim Scott
something likely to have been "forged" in the womb and not the result of later learning processes.
The key word here is likely, so we have more scientific guessing as a foundation for more assumptions, which develop into a very solid theory that everyone will assume is a fact.
Welcome to the evolution of false logic and false science.
Is it possible that his scientific study is funded by some pro-gay agenda?
[edit on 4/14/2010 by Jim Scott]
Originally posted by Hullabaloo
reply to post by crmanager
First of all homosexuals are not another species. Secondly, just because someone can't reproduce doesn't mean they are worthless.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
It's just your brain shooting chemicals around...
Ohh well, some will argue this isn't proof of anything without peer review and further study. I somewhat agree.
Let's not discredit sound science and replace it with moral objection or personal belief.
Originally posted by Torgo
If homosexuality isn't "natural", then you've got quite a lot of work ahead of you informing all the thousands of other species out there that what some of them are doing is beyond the confines of nature.
Damn you, Gay Agenda! Can't you see that your sexual perversion is seeping into the mainstream culture of wildlife?! When will you learn that your crazy liberal ideals of "self governance" only end up hurting everyone and everything within your natural environment? Clearly, we need to start up some sort of natural tea party to reign in all of those gay sheep out there:
www.time.com...
It's time we sent a clear message to nature! You either clean up your act, or we're going after the "unnatural" one's first!
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
If a couple are deserted on desert island, which one (heterosexual or homosexual) do you think has a better chance of survival...
and starting their own civilisation
Originally posted by bsbray11
So I take it "natural" to you does not mean "occurs in nature."
Right?
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
Originally posted by bsbray11
So I take it "natural" to you does not mean "occurs in nature."
Right?
There are many definitions of nature/natural.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Right, of course there are.
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
Glad you agree. Don't you hate it when somebody reads the first line of your post and replies without reading the rest?
This doesn't mean that it is wrong or worthy of discrimination, just that it is not natural and should NOT be glamorised the way it is in the Western media.