posted on Apr, 15 2010 @ 12:35 PM
Seems like you are a person with some VERY interesting theories to share. It's too bad you had to begin by being so negative. I understand some of
your comments, and being someone that visits the quakewatch, volcanowatch and yellowstone watch threads almost exclusively here on ATS, I have to
kindly disagree with you.
I post mainly on the yellowstone thread, but observe the others for the up-to-date info found there. I have noticed recently that when something is
happening, it can be found on these threads sometimes hours before you see any mention in MSM. Amazing.
While I could see where someone who doesn't have an interest in sharing all this info might not understand all the posting....I have a very simple
suggestion for you: Don't open the thread
. There, problem solved.
As for the various accusations about bullying other posters and trying to get points and wasting bandnwidth, etc., I am pretty sure that is what the
moderators are for and if you feel that strongly maybe you should send them an alert rather than jumping on a random thread to bash others?
As for this EQ, I imagine that there must be some sort of significance for the OP or they wouldn't have posted it. Too bad they did not go on to
explain why they started the thread.
Again, I am very intrigued, RussianScientist, by some of your claims and it's too bad that you are bashing the very people that would have the most
interest in what it is you have to say.
Edit to add: I may have misread your earlier post. I think it may have been the Kansas quake you mentioned...but given the vicinity, I am assuming
that these are related to the same system and therefore still conected?
[edit on 15-4-2010 by westcoast]