It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Possible Hoax - Obama has issues: His Resume this time

page: 1

log in


posted on Apr, 13 2010 @ 02:02 PM
Mods you can delete this thread, I see it has already been determined
that his resume is not in question, and the world is just making stuff up
about Mr. Obama to get him out of office... when govt is concerned you
have to look on both sides of something to see there is a third.

"I am knowingly posting information, that Heir Bama has declared truthful. but ATS will rule, it a Hoax...? they all cant be hoaxes people. he cant have this many enemies." A-E~!"

In what is being called 'the biggest hustle in human history,' a special investigation has discovered numerous bogus claims on Barack Obama's resume, including the outright lie that he was a 'Constitutional scholar and professor.'

The claim turns out to be false.

(AP Photo/Alex Brandon).

As investigators delve further into the background of Barack Obama, a disturbing picture is emerging of a man who is not who he claims to be. The information the public has been told concerning Obama is turning out to be false--fabrications and inventions of a man and an unseen force behind him that had clear ulterior motives for seeking the highest office in the land.

According to a special report issued by 'the Blogging Professor,' the Chicago Law School faculty hated Obama. The report states that Obama was unqualified, that he was never a 'constitutional professor and scholar,' and that he never served as editor of the Harvard Law Review while a student at the school.

The real truth is that Barack Obama was merely an 'instructor' at Chicago Law School, not a professor. Commonly, instructors are non-tenure-track teachers hired by colleges and universities to teach certain courses for a salary that is well below that of Associate Professors or full Professors.

In the hierarchy of higher education, the status of instructors is below that of associate professors and professors because they lack the credentials.

In fact, it can be safely concluded that the claims of Barack Obama concerning his educational credentials and work history in higher education are a complete sham. The President of the United States is a complete fraud.

[edit on 13-4-2010 by Anti-Evil]

posted on Apr, 13 2010 @ 02:07 PM
Be careful on this one... It has already been poked to death over a battle of semantics.

posted on Apr, 13 2010 @ 02:09 PM
hum, I did a screen and didn't find the thread. so its a words game these people want. swords it shall be.

posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 04:35 PM
Its not semantics...Its BS

The Op is qouting a blog..who removed his BS and admits he was qouting another blog...and that blog is a spam email.

Since I continue to get blasted with emails (supportive, critical and ones asking to interview me as having written some kind of 'special report' which I did not do), I am removing those parts of this post that I did not myself investigate.

I'll say once again as I've said to several emailers, I didn't do the original investigation of this. This was a pass-down from another blog cited in the post, and these are allegations from sources that I haven't confirmed.]

the original Blog...the one cited by the blog..that the article cited...aparrently got it's info from a SPAM EMAIL...

From the blog...I am not kidding..

As usual, all feedback -- especially rumors, innuendo and outright speculation -- is welcome.

The fallacy that this smear email looks to capitailize on is the idea that President Obama was a "Professor" of law.
President Obama never claimed to be a "Professor" of Law and his professional resume has always indicated his accurate title as a "Senior Lecturer" at the Law School.

So the Spam/Smear email first makes the false claim that he has a resume claiming he was a "professor" and then accuses him of lying on that resume.

BS upon...BS...upon BS...premised on a smear email.

[edit on 14-4-2010 by maybereal11]

posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 04:40 PM
Uh.......didn't we already suffer through this hoax last week.
Come in man, at least get some new material!
This claim was BS last time, and is STILL BS!

posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 05:01 PM
The other thread (using the exact same source) was labeled a HOAX. It's not about semantics.

Anti-Evil, may I suggest you scour the HOAX forum before you post another Anti-Obama thread?

posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 05:02 PM
reply to post by OldDragger

Yes. I think the hope is that if he himself includes "possible hoax" in his own headline that the mods will browse past it.

Double your Hoax pleasure here!

Nobody should be dissuaded from posting BS just because it has been thoroughly disproven already!

posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 05:09 PM
reply to post by OldDragger

Uh.......didn't we already suffer through this hoax last week.

That's usually how long it takes for the same garbage to pop back up.

It's getting old.

new topics

top topics


log in