It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Okay, not really. But that's what all the birthers are saying!
arcticshadow's diary :: ::
Certified birther-in-chief Orly Taitz's website, Defend our freedoms has been shut down by the webmaster. Apparently she didn't want to ruin her reputation by maintaining Orly's nonsense and bullcrap. Since the site is no longer censored, over 500 hilarious comments have been said since the original post went up.
What happened to Dr. Orly Taitz's Blog? What happened to Dr. Orly Taitz's websites.
No, the FBI did not shut it down.
No, Obama did not shut it down.
No, her web host did not shut it down.
Grab a cup of coffee and pull up a chair.
Let's go back to Dr. Orly's first blogsite and start there.
I was an assistant web moderator on drorly.blogspot.com
The site is still there. You can go see it.
The last message displaying on the posted blog is saying the site was sabotaged and redirects you to DefendOurFreedoms.US.
Allow me to give you background on that.
That drorly.blogspot.com did have some nefarious functions. But those functions were authorized by Orly. I assumed it was because she didn't understand the internet. There was a 3rd party program added to drorly.blogspot.com. This program was collecting everyones information and transfering it to an unknown server. Anyone that visited the site. Anyone that posted at the site. The data was being collected. Why? I don't know. Did Orly know? Yes she did. She authorized the head webmaster for that blog to install it on 12/24/08.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by MysterE
I will admit that I loathe the birther conspiracy. I hate hacking even more.
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
26302 La Paz ste 211
Mission Viejo CA 92691
Chief Justice Roberts,
Supreme Court of the United States;
Associate Justices of the Supreme Court;
William K. Sutton Chief clerk
of the Supreme Court;
Officer Christine Giaccio,
officer in charge Supreme Court of United States;
Secret service agent
Supreme Court of the United States
Open letter, request for cooperation in FBI investigation
Dear ladies and gentlemen,
This is to inform you that I have filed a complaint with the FBI relating to a number of crimes, including cyber crimes that I and my clients have encountered while pursuing legal actions of illegitimacy for presidency of Mr. Barack Hussein Obama. On the matter of cyber crimes, the case was referred to the cyber crimes unit at the Santa Ana, Orange County FBI, at 901 Civic center Dr. W., Santa Ana CA. The officer in charge of my case is FBI Agent Nathan Reed, 714-245-5328, 310-710-3459. One of the Cyber Crimes reported, was erasing from the exterior docket of the Supreme Court all mention of my case Lightfoot v Bowen questioning legitimacy of Obama for presidency. Particularly egregious was the fact that the case was erased on January 21, when the Supreme Court first opened after inauguration of Obama and it was reentered back on the docket only on January 22, towards the end of the day, right before the conference on the morning January, the 23rd.
According to FBI Agent Nathan Reed, even though, the docket is related to my case, technically the Supreme Court was the victim of hacking and he needs cooperation from the Supreme court, as a victim organization to investigate the mater of the case being erased from it's exterior docket. I request from the Supreme Court a letter of such cooperation with my complaint. This is particularly important in light of the fact that there is a common denominator in a number of cyber crimes committed, such as:
1. there was a hacking into my foundation pay-pal account, where my e-mail address was changed with a scope of impeding receipt of donations
2. sabotage of my previous web site/blog, where the blog would crush upon comment entry, flushing virus messages, and diversion of traffic to porn sites
3. constant sabotage and hacking into my new site/blog
4. creation of an impostor site for officer Scott Easterling, with the scope of assassinating the character of the active military officer in Iraq, who happens to be a lead plaintiff in Obama ineligibility legal action
5. erasing of my wikipedia page and source having a banner on his page, showing hanging of Saddam Hussein
6. fabricating a decision of a Virginia judge, claiming proper vetting of Obama's birth certificate and posting this fraudulent decision on the Internet on November 3rd, one day before the National election with the scope of committing massive fraud of American voters.
All of these cyber crimes, together with all the other crimes that are handled separately, have one common denominator- concerted effort to put Obama in the White House and keep him there by virtue of fraud and concealment of all of his records.
I hope that the Supreme Court will show proper cooperation in investigation of such crimes by the FBI and other agencies and I request a letter of cooperation to that extend. Refusal to provide such letter of cooperation will amount to obstruction of Justice and aiding and abetting all of the above crimes.
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
cc Senator Leahy, Senate Judiciary Committee
cc Senator Specter Ranking Member Senate Judiciary Committee
cc Senator Reid -senate Majority leader
cc Senator Kyl -Senate Minority leader
cc Nanci Pelosi, Speaker of the House
cc Eric Holder, department of Justice
cc Elena Kagan, Solicitor General
cc Captain Crawford, Legal Counsel for the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
just gave a brief explanation on the last blog. That was not hacked. That was authorized by Orly.
These sites, defendourfreedoms.us and defendourfreedoms.org, were never hacked. Why does it matter? Because they are my sites on my accounts. I supported Orly and have always been involved with politics, campaigns and causes. So when I saw the antics with the java script program on the other blog, and it was never clear on how much she realized was going on, I took her over here to my accounts. Defendourfreedoms, all of the domains, are on my web accounts. So, when you are a guest in someone's establishment (my sites) and you start claiming injury (hacking/sabotage), that affects the owner, me.