It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Originally posted by bkyle
The Zeitgeist crowd seem to be unable to explain a concrete model of how it will lack any forms of units of measurement of value or resources.
They are unable to explain one because there intentionally isn't one. There cannot be one. As soon as objects have "value", then we all just go back to fighting over who has the most, why I don't have enough, why you deserve more, etc.
Imagine a system of true abundance for all of humanity's needs. If food, shelter, education, medicine, and all the needs we have can be produced in abundance for all, then there value is zero.
You still haven't explained anything new.
It's all based on an unproven notion that there will be endless resources, and endless energy. These things don't exist. The technology to replace petroleum based products doesn't exist, and I'm not talking about gasoline and diesel.
The machines to figure it all out and dictate to us how much we can use, and how we dispose of things, to ensure the abundance doesn't exist.
ZP isn't real, it's sombody's IDEAL. It's utopian, and without being based on real things it's doomed to become dystopian. There's no way around this. And worst of all they're trying to set it up globally, where everyone and everything is subject to the oligarchy of humans that will have to operate it until they get their global 'Skynet' system, if that's even possible, and then it might be smart enough to ration etc where humans absolutely are not.
So, without all that, there will need to be something that represents your consumption of the utopia. Just saying there wont be isn't an actual model. That's more akin to rejecting the idea of needing a model of a proposed complexsystem. Economics isn't simple, nor is resource management, and all the rest that goes with any society, let alone the entire world.
And never mind the pollution that would happen if every month a faster CPU is manufactured and everyone decided they want the new one even though their 'old' one is still good. That is just one tiny example of the absurdity of all this. Having to save money is a good thing in many ways: you only get the best you can afford, but more importantly only as often as necessary. If all people were upgrading their computers just for the sake of being able to do it each month, the waste disposal this world would be up against would have us all already living in a post apocalyptic waste land.
[edit on 10-7-2010 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]
Originally posted by ciaran_anthony
Hi guys, I have been arguing with the Zeitgeist cult for a long time, I have researched it thoroughly, the cult is made up of easily manipulated highschool teenagers and intellectually retarded adults that desperately want a change to our current way of life, the Zeitgeist film has a profound visual impact on the viewer. Peter Joseph works in marketing and was an amature video maker, Jacque Fresco is a former member of the Klu Klux Klan and The White Citizens Council, Fresco has a dubious past of money making ventures that resulted in people loosing money but Fresco always came away from it with loaded pockets!
The Venus Project rakes in over 100,000 dollars a year in donations, that money is funneled through the venus project for non profit section and also the hidden for profit section!
Fresco is a crook, for a man that is against the monetary system he does fairly well from it.....after all, fuel for his private hellicopter dosent come cheap!
So...dont delay, visit the Venus Project website today and buy you venus project photos signed by Jacque Fresco today for the sum of $100 or more of the Venus project merchandise................Zeitgeist T-Shirts for $14!
Or better still..email the Venus Project and tell them they should be ashamed of themselves for preying on the weak minded!
Originally posted by ghostsoldier
Under The Venus Project: Rules are made according to objects:
eg: new mobile phones are given out every 10 years, in between they will be maintained, meanwhile 10 years is spent researching and developing the new model as much as possible, as one replaces the other, the older version will be recycled to help build the next one.
Originally posted by bkyle
I love examples! Let's talk about fast CPU's. Imagine that you lived in the world of The Venus Project. Relax, it's just for this example. You need a new computer. You go down to the computer place and pick one up (or have it delivered or whatever). It will be the best computer that humanity has ever produced for your needs. There is no money, so money is not an object. There is no choice between a dozen different almost-the-same computers that differ only in RAM, HD, resolution, etc. You get the largest RAM, largest HD, best resolution, etc. Literally, it is the best available anywhere.
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by ciaran_anthony
Hi guys, I have been arguing with the Zeitgeist cult for a long time, I have researched it thoroughly, the cult is made up of easily manipulated highschool teenagers and intellectually retarded adults
Jacque Fresco is a former member of the Klu Klux Klan and The White Citizens Council, Fresco has a dubious past of money making ventures that resulted in people loosing money but Fresco always came away from it with loaded pockets!
The Venus Project rakes in over 100,000 dollars a year in donations, that money is funneled through the venus project for non profit section and also the hidden for profit section!
Fresco is a crook, for a man that is against the monetary system he does fairly well from it.....after all, fuel for his private hellicopter dosent come cheap!
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
[
You guys might get a clue here:
www.kurzweilai.net...
Anyone who has read the first 2 pages of the thread has seen my citations showing ZM/VP (ZP) ideas being completely plagiarized by (1) pure communism and (2) the early 1900's Technocrat Movement.
It turns out that the Soviet Union was precisely that: Marxism evolved into technocratism. That's the natural course, unless to go completely backwards.
I Repeat: TZM is hardcore Leninism / Stalinism, and theres no debating this fact.
Originally posted by TeeZedem
• Central Bank. No No No
• Government Ownership of Communication and Transportation. No
• Government Ownership of Factories and Agriculture. No
• Government Control of Labor. No
• Corporate Farms and Regional Planning. Techno farms and global planning, so yes
• Government Control of Education. No
1 : the act or process of governing; specifically : authoritative direction or control
I would concede that some ideas come from the Technocrat movement and some would come from pure communism, but the synthesis of both are something entirely new which have never been tried before.
The Soviet Union tried to turn everyone into little scientists, quite frankly we will not need everyone to be scientists as the machines will eventually be self-maintaining, we instead would like everyone to pursue that which they are interested in (i.e. art, music, comedy, exploration). Another failure was that technology had not progressed far enough to allow for the freeing of human labour by machines, but today we are seeing it happen with rampant technological employment.
Thought you were comparing TZM to pure communism? Neither Leninism nor Stalinism was not pure communism. Marx advocated a moneyless society, that is not what Stalin implemented.
Originally posted by TeeZedem
I watched that video and it seems the point you are trying to make (Communism being a failure) mostly resulted in the lack of their technology's ability to predict demand resulting in inefficient allocation of resources and insufficient production ramp up. This has largely been addressed by today's JIT systems.
Also their blind, dogmatic reliance on "the plan" didn't have any flexibility and led to the absurdities we witnessed. The plan wasn't geared towards making the best most sustainable product, rather it was geared to meeting quota's and motivated by the amount of materials it used up. This is not a plan that has any long-term stability. I believe they relied so much on the plan because they really didn't have a better way to measure how their system was impacting the people. This is a technological failing.
With TVP, all designs are to be the best they can be given the available knowledge, but they also must be as sustainable as technology and innovative use of resources allows.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Definition of government:
1 : the act or process of governing; specifically : authoritative direction or control
Replacing an oligarchy of humans with a global AI/AGI computer network doesn't mean an actual end of 'government'.
Rationing resources doesn't end 'money'.
At least you're being honest.
I almost had to beat it out of Ghostsoldier.
And it still hasn't. Meanwhile that promise goes all the way back into the mid-1800's, by the pure communists.
They had their units of measure of value, and so will any system no matter what they promise: Period.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Basically everything you said is a total admission that ZP is about doing damn near exactly what the Soviet Union did, now actually feasible with modern technology (which it still isn't). It's like praising the SU as being ahead of it's time, and now we can finally institute this monolithically and globally.
The answer: "Through agreement".
Watch what happens next: I don't agree, and never will (along with a bare minimum of half of any population almost anywhere on earth.
You seem reasonable at least.
Let's say for arguments sake that it is a global AI. You would never build a system that didn't have safeguards built into it, hardwired and not programmed, not too mention numerous kill/reboot switches that you could use in the event of an emergency. What Jacques talks about is having multiple redundancies in every design to make it as safe as it can possibly be given the day's technology.
The AI doesn't "own" anything, it manages the system for our benefit. Not it's benefit.
You say money is supposed to represent resources, obviously that system is broken, because what do derivatives represent? They are bets on underlying assets and are assigned a value, but they could never be cashed in, to do so would end civilization overnight.
You mean to say that technological unemployment is not occurring as we type? Labour is being replaced by machines at an accelerated rate.
Let no one person have more power than another then we act as each others check and balance.
So in an RBE, we can't force you to do that which you do not want to do, but it would be logical and in your best interest to co-operate.
Wouldn't it be better to work cooperatively than to work in opposition i.e. competition?
Meaning, you'll need a global network of machines smarter than humans. At that point you now have AGI. There is no possible way to have 'killswitches'. Listen to any and all of the very scientists who are currently working feverishly to do it. Every single one of them concede there will be no way to control it.
When AI becomes AGI almost overnight it would become the dominent species on earth.
If you take anything from any of this let it be this:
We don't "need" things like derivatives.
The fact is there are many solutions to the problems in his various presentations, not just one 'final solution' to all of our problems.
And again the thing they fail to address is the Iron Law of Oligarchy. The Law is inherent in systems of power, and this wouldn't change by handing over control to a new species of rapidly evolving machines.
Now that is a difficult problem.
That sounds like a good idea, but the bigger you make governments the worse the power effects always play out.
The technologies ZP needs aren't even here.
Work would still have to be done, and someone or something will have to dish it out.
There's a massive difference between automating manufacturing, and all of the rest of the work that gets done everyday.
That sounds nice, might make a good song, but that's not how people are.
I hear a lot of nay saying. If we design it, how can we not be able to control it? Can you provide some links of the scientists that say we cannot control such a thing?
And do we really need an AI? Could we not have a series of automated systems and expert systems that are created to do one job or assist in the decision making for one area?
What does an AI require to continue to exist? I would say energy and some raw materials for repairs. Is it going to want to procreate? Why? It is essentially immortal. We should delve into this question more.
If something needs doing and it benefits you and those in your community, then you’ll do it.
If it was my movement, I would probably say the same thing. No one wants a leader who says “This should work, at least I’m fairly sure, unless someone has a better idea”. It is typically human.
The system didn’t start out designed to screw everyone over,
How long do we wait until it all comes back under a new guise?
That is assuming that machines will be subject to the same irrationalities that we are.
I’m not thinking one big global government, but rather every individual is sovereign. Think 7 billion kings and queens. You will never accomplish anything through force, you have no choice but to co-operate with your fellow sovereigns.
But according to your links they are not far off. Indeed they will probably happen within our lifetime. So TZM is getting off to an early start to make sure we are mature enough to handle what is coming.
We are as we are raised, but we can also be who we chose to be.
TZM wouldn’t ban sports, what would be the point?
I could spend 3 or 4 pages going into how completely out of touch with reality those 2 statements are, especially considering this supposed to be some technocratic utopia. You guys seriously have no clue how innovation actually works
As much as I love to debate, I seriously don't have time or have had time to pick your statements apart one by one like I'd love to.
Originally posted by Oolon
If Zeitgeist does anything, it only serves as a wake up call. Start thinking for ourselves and think outside the box. Instead of wasting time and effort on just debunking, show us something better. This goes for me too.
Neither of you display non-irrational reason. Both of you are critical and confrontational.
I've posted quite a bit o' things actually, that were worth my time, yet you don't actually address any of that. It's like screaming "I'm a technocrat-marxist, and I'm superior because it's not worth your time time single-handedly respond to en entire page of posts".
I could spend 3 or 4 pages going into how completely out of touch with reality those 2 statements are, especially considering this supposed to be some technocratic utopia. You guys seriously have no clue how innovation actually works