posted on May, 5 2010 @ 01:01 AM
Heffo, I have been studying the audio further. Cutting certain sections and replaying, applying various filters etc to try to get the background noise
clearer/stronger. I would like to revise my thoughts that I couldn't be sure the noises came from something bipedal. It's now very obvious that at
certain times the noises were made by something large and bipedal. I know that kangaroos can give the impression of something large walking around
the bush as I have heard them while camping. Though once disturbed they bound away with a sound that is unmistakable, this sounds nothing like that.
At times it seems the footsteps are quite deliberate and exaggerated, as though the feet were being deliberately stomped loudly. At one stage the
footsteps also appear to be that of something running quickly(around 1min 20sec), yet the noise seems to stay at the same distance and there is not
the normal sound of undergrowth being disturbed, leaves/twigs crunching when something runs through the bush. Almost as though someone found a nice
solid base and started running/stomping quickly on the spot (with very large feet?). Yet at other times it is obvious there is something (plural)
walking around him of different sizes/weights?. It also appears that this background noise is happening virtually for the length of the video.
The sound of the projectile hitting the ground also gives the impression that it was very large, landing somewhere devoid of leaves twigs etc. I can
actually hear it bounce and roll quite a bit after it lands. As though it were a very large piece of sandstone (common in the area), landing on firm
clay. Very interesting.
I even cut out the parts where he is speaking to try and get a better listen to the background, but haven't picked up any sign of other voices, or
anything that might be a giveaway of pranksters. The sound gathering of these cameras isn't generally very good either, the noises must have been
quite loud to be picked up so (relatively) well. 50ft away sounds like no exageration, I would say to my untrained ears it all sounds quite closer
than that at times. This is only what I have found though, I am a complete amateur.
The only real reason I had pranksters as one possible scenario is because it is possible, though after considering everything it does seem unlikely. A
hoax would be more likely than this. Though personally at this stage I am not convinced that this is a simple hoax, for various reasons (though
haven't completely ruled it out).
Which leaves the other alternative......
[edit on 5-5-2010 by Cogito, Ergo Sum]