It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CHRLZ
Anyway, I shall continue to look it over, but rather than hijack this thread too much, perhaps any Belgian UFO case experts might like to summarise the key VERIFIABLE points of the case, so that they can be addressed directly and briefly...
Originally posted by CHRLZ
Wow, thanks Arbitrageur - you're a minefield of information!
As a very keen photographer myself, that type of image can indeed be faked with relative ease (yes, down to the grain level on a film neg/transparency). It looks like a very simple double exposure (this was the days of film, of course). There is no reliable way to determine if film has been doubly exposed, and dark backgrounds make such trickery easy. It all goes to show that 'experts' may not be all that they seem (especially on the History Channel..)
Originally posted by RRokkyy
top ten reasons aliens dont show themselves
1.We will eat them
2.We will steal their technology,go to their home planet and eat them
3. Our dogs will eat them
4.We wont eat them but feed them to our dogs
5.They wont be able to resist the temptation to eat us
6.Their dogs will eat us
7. They wont be able to resist the temptation to feed us to their dogs
8. They are too sexy for the earth
9. Earthlings would want to have sex with them.
10. They would want to have sex with Earthlings
11. They would get $1,000,000 dollars from the Amazing Randi and they are communists.
[edit on 13-4-2010 by RRokkyy]
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
But SOBEPS cracks me up even more than Haines. According to SOBEPs:
Radar lock-on #1 was bad radar data
Radar lock-on #2 was bad radar data
Radar lock-on #3 was bad radar data
Radar lock-on #4 was bad radar data
Radar lock-on #5 was bad radar data
Radar lock-on #6 was bad radar data
Radar lock-on #7 was bad radar data
Radar lock-on #8 was bad radar data
Do you see a pattern here?
Originally posted by nablator
That in a nutshell is the sad state of Ufology today, humans deceiving humans. If there is a real phenomenon, I have yet to see any evidence of it that would stand under scientific scrutiny.
Goodbye Ufology Hello Truth by James Carrion
Originally posted by Insomniac
reply to post by CYRAX
Sadly you have a very good point! There are a number of people who seem to think of debunking as sport.
Star for your post, that's one of the best articles I've read from an insider. I think he's referring to all the people selling books on UFOlogy, and I have also found many of those to be biased, and that they don't consider alternative explanations, and are misleading from that perspective.