It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/bed460ccf27e.jpg[/atsimg]
Looking at the above summary, it is plainly obvious that overall, earthquake activity was on a gradual decline in the decades prior to 1990 but then unexpectedly, in the year 1991, some kind of 'tipping point' was reached and the number and intensity of subsequent earthquakes in all magnitude ranges began a steady and statistically significant increase.
Amalgamating all the data from the 3 magnitude ranges still shows a consistent and undeniable trend of increasing earthquake activity as is obvious in the overall increase of 38%.
So, can we conclude that the 'feelings' and 'impressions' that many ATS members have regarding significant increases in earthquake activity is justified ?
From the above analysis, it appears that we can conclude that there is indeed strong justification for such a belief.
PREDICTION
Based on the observed trends, it is more than likely that earthquake activity will continue to increase over time and that based on the above clearly observed trends, the greater proportion of future major earthquake events will be seen to occur primarily within the 6.0 to 6.9 magnitude range. However, it would also appear that we will be seeing increasing numbers of events also occurring within the 7.0 to 7.9 and 8.0 and higher magnitude ranges, compared to what were observed to have happened in past decades.
However if anything does happen on the scale the prophecies claim there's likely not much we can do about it so instead of worrying about it just sit back and enjoy the exciting times ahead of us. At least if it kills me I'll have witnessed something truely spectacular before I die
Originally posted by Discotech
reply to post by randyvs
I have no issues with the book, I just choose not to believe what it has to say, to me it's just a book of fiction with some documented truth (place names, certain events, etc) much like most fictional books that have been written throughout time
Don't forget the missing page from the Bible...
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by MoorfNZ
Don't forget the missing page from the Bible...
Ok. I expected that. No I really did.
But that's not the reality of the thing and I'm not preaching.
Do Bible scholars catch this kind of flack from you guys?:
Lets drop it for my sake.
[edit on 11-4-2010 by randyvs]