It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
to get soemthing of that magnitude in a place not on a fault, at a depth of 600+KM is very very worrying.
Microseismicity and tectonics in the Granada Basin (Spain)
Abstract
A microseismic experiment carried out in 1994 in the Granada Basin (Spain) permitted the precise recording of more than 80 local earthquakes. The dense distribution of the local network, with 40 to 50 instrumental records for each event, enabled us to have well-controlled hypocenters, and also 10 reliable focal mechanisms. The above observations are interpreted together with topographic data, neotectonics, and sub-surface information. Microtectonic observations in Sierra Elvira, Padul and Zafarraya gave a set of fault planes and striae, which were interpreted in terms of the recent regional stress tensor. The actual stress tensor obtained from the microseismic campaign data gives a regime in radial extension, with σ1 vertical and σ3 oriented NS to NNE. Microtectonic information is coherent with these orientations, but closer to 3-axial extension. A set of 64 mechanisms obtained from the permanent Andalusian network favors a NS orientation for σ3. This results are interpreted in terms of the general model implying the lateral ejection of the Betic ranges towards the Atlantic.
Earthquake Risk To Granada, Spain
Jan. 20,2010
With the catastrophic impact of the recent Haiti earthquake, Francisco Vidal, researcher from the Andalusian Institute of Geophysics, has released information on the effects of a similar occurrence in Granada, Spain which lies on a fault line of the earth’s crust.
Originally posted by JakiusFogg
to get soemthing of that magnitude in a place not on a fault, at a depth of 600+KM is very very worrying.
Originally posted by JakiusFoggIts only April and already we have big big EQs and it is NOT just the media highlighting it!
Don't think
Nothing out of the ordinary to worry about
Originally posted by randyvs
Does your chart include the ones they've erased?
reply to post by Discotech
would point you to this discussion on GLP (low-brow, I know) where more than one person mention they saw two distinct quakes near Granada. They provide the link to USGS site which is now, of course, only showing the one 6.2 magnitude.
i dont see "randyvs" comments as anywhere near religious. its all cycles and mathematics, imho.
USGS don't just revise quakes down or remove them for their own ends - there's no conspiracy - just good housekeeping.
One goes up but it's magnitude is incorrect