It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by electrobadgr
I don't have a child but if i got cancer i would be more inclined to use Hemp Oil than i would be to bombard my body with radiation for a possible temporary fix.
With all due respect, walk the walk...then report back to me.
Originally posted by Zosynspiracy
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
A real MD would never use the term lipid dystrophy plain and simple.
Anyone with ANY familiarity of the terminology used in AIDS/HIV which is where it is so commonly applied knows it's lipodystrophy. Along with your complete irrelevant discussion of ART/LIPO dystrophy and cancer you are at worst a fraud and at best an out of the loop primary MD with little knowledge of cancer and oncology in general.
Ascrobate plays many roles in many physiological pathways.....for you to insuate that intravenous vitamin C therapy is commonly used in cancer treatment among mainstream oncologists is downright laughable and shows just how out of touch you are.
In fact with MANY oncologists Vitamin C therapy especially intravenously is contraindicated due to research showing it can actually protect cancer cells as it does healthy cells and can lessen the effectiveness of chemotherapy.
MANY oncologists are apt to prescribe it concomittantly with chemo drugs. That came to light in 2008. Now they are saying vitamin C doesn't affect cancer cells. so again they the medical establishment has no clue what they are talking about. And 40 years later the war on cancer is producing MISERABLE results.
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by electrobadgr
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck
.....if you believe that Big Pharma cares for you and are dilegently working on a cancer cure for the benefit of mankind then you sir are sadly deluded. Big Pharma doesn't care and GP's are nothing more than salesmen.
Electrobadgr.....
I work at a senior level in the medical industry.
I can assure there are many, many thousands of extremely decent, extremely intelligent hard working men & women who are doing everything they can to achieve cures for cancer.
Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by electrobadgr
If i get cancer, you'll be the first to know what treatment i go for, however as a cannabis smoker i could be waiting a while.
Perhaps that's because i don't feel the need to desperately cling to life, i am not scared of death and certainly wouldn't favour months of painful treatment to scrape another month or two out of the ether.
Hodgkin's lymphoma has a 90% cure rate with early detection. Nice try........NEXT!
Let's see where you are 5-10 years from now and if you're "cured".
Originally posted by chorizo4
reply to post by Maddogkull
Alternative Cancer Treatments Home Page (the Cancer Tutor Website). This is one site I have looked at it is interesting.
Originally posted by Zosynspiracy
Oh well but but there were so many well intentioned Germans during Hitler's reign. Your naivety is amazing.
# Hydrazine sulfate is a chemical compound that has been studied as a treatment for cancer and certain side effects caused by cancer (see Question 1).
# Hydrazine sulfate may block the tumor from taking in glucose, which is a type of sugar that tumor cells need to grow (see Question 3).
# In randomized clinical trials (a type of research study), hydrazine sulfate did not make tumors shrink or go away. In some randomized trials, however, hydrazine sulfate was reported to be helpful in treating anorexia and cachexia caused by cancer. (See Question 6.)
# Hydrazine sulfate is sold as a dietary supplement in the United States. The US Food and Drug Administration has not approved the use of hydrazine sulfate as a cancer treatment, except in clinical trials (see Question 8).
Originally posted by Zosynspiracy
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck
Exactly..and not only were many clueless as to what was going on right under their noses.....they were powerless to stop it. THAT IS MY POINT! There are medical breakthroughs that happen on a daily basis. The general public never sees let alone hears about any of them. Some are extremely groundbreaking. But if any happen to challenge the existing cash cow status quo treatment they are shunned, ridiculed and lied about. Happens all the time. Sounds to me like you are very ignorant about the history of medicine in general and how allopathic medicine came to power in the United States.
Originally posted by Zosynspiracy
You can put all the faith you want in mainstream medicine......but the facts speak for themselves. We have been losing the war on cancer after spending billions and billions of dollars on research, treatment etc. You know what it's called when you do the same thing over and over but expecting different results???????? INSANITY!
Originally posted by Zosynspiracy
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck
Which chemotherapeutic treatment were you on? What was your diet like? There are so many factors to consider. To poo poo conventional medicine because you were told to take such and such by a single physician or follow such and such only to see no results after three months is a little ignorant. The cancer that infiltrated your body didn't take 3 months to get there.