Yes, I am in favor of this...seems the most logical step. But not the fed...state to state.
Well for the record, Im pro something similar to this but I think that too much government control in the banking sector can have a knock on effect on
over regulation of the entire economy and while it does keep control of the banking system in the hands of the elected officials.. Its still not
devoid of major risks.. One of which is stagnation... Which is as bad and sometimes worse than recession..
State run or region run with a federal regulatory body is a good idea though.. the only problem is getting it past the die hard capitalists..
And what you say with
slower growth or rapid decline
doesn't really apply for this I don't think .. Changing the banking sector to a
taxpayer owned system in the middle of a recession like this is financial suicide because the toxic debts will be owned by the taxpayer then as
opposed to being owned by the banks.. Even if the taxpayer is bailing out those banks to stabilize the debts, the bailout money will be returned.
Best time to do it is on the at a high point of an upswing from a deep recession so it wouldn't help curb the recession we are in now, it would
probably make things worse unfortunately.
But I do 100% believe that the Banks should be owned by the people.. That is socialism however.. Its not that Im not a bit of a leftist, I just see
that capitalism is an extremely important element in it.
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
Do you know if the French system is national or provincial?
I am not 100% sure mate, its a complicated enough system, might be worth looking it up.