posted on Apr, 11 2010 @ 05:30 AM
I intended to kill four people. Three were killed and the forth was made a vegtable. I didn't do it. I had reason to. No investigation of it even
though two were gun runners, one was a drug dealing pimp, and the other was a contract killer. LEO's will say I donn't know aht I am talking about.
That I would not have known about the investigation. Wrong. I had access to police computers. To the NCIS coputer. I would have known. If I was going
to do it myself what is my beef? That is the problem.
I suspect LEO's did it for me. I won't go into what was going on. It would take to long. My problem is this. If a bugler breaks into my house I will
capture him if I can. If he is carrying a badge I will kill him. Why? What is the difference between the two? The badge. the immunity. If I had killed
the above I would have done it as a father, a private citizen, and had to take my chances with the court. A LEO has immunity so long as he hasn't
pissed off his fellow offers. The same with a prosecuter or judge.
Pelosi has said that politicians can not be held personally responsible for their votes. Is she nuts? If it was LEO's who did the above they probably
think I owe them a favor I see where they are coming from but they are wrong. They have taken the right and the consequences of defending my family
away from. What is worse is they did it with immunity. Can anyone besides me see the difference?
Many LEO's are friends of mine. I have told them that it would not bother me if they were killed in uniform. If they have personal problems I will be
there for them whatever they need but as officers on the job I have no sympathy for them. Most understand the difference as they know me. Can you?