It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by jackflap
Think along these lines first Proto. It seems to me that someone would actually have to make rules as to what is right and what is wrong. Those rules would have to be learned because like you said, some people can be inherently wrong in their thought processes.
Perhaps this is what is inherently wrong in all of our thought processes, and that is the belief that others must be wrong, because we don’t consider them right.
Whereas
These would be my rules.
1. Murder no one.
2. Take nothing that is not yours without permission of who is in possession of it.
3. Never use violence as a method to solve a dispute or as a means to an end.
4. Judge no one, who has not done 1, 2, or 3!
exploitable and manipulated by those simply seeking power, control and profit.
Thanks my friend.
On Iarga a nearby planet they have 30 billion people,
they have no more forests.
We have to allow predation and serial killers if we are to naturally maintain population levels at equilibrium
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by lowki
On Iarga a nearby planet they have 30 billion people,
they have no more forests.
We have to allow predation and serial killers if we are to naturally maintain population levels at equilibrium
The present Elites do keep an eye towards preserving resources to the extent that they can, through artificial scarcity and induced wars, disasters and plagues…
But, at the same time, they encourage and subsidize over breeding through tax credits, and welfare supplements.
Which is really creating a system where most people are raised simply to be expendable, and I am of the humble opinion that there is a better way.
In part it lays in the tribal concept, the notion of a village, raising a child, instead of a family.
As people like Alethea and StormDancer are putting forth in a small tribal village setting, child rearing could be more village oriented and intensive, in a way, where that woman, or man who just has to have a baby because they are so darn cute, can always watch or partake in a quality growth oriented activity with a neighbor’s child.
Children would have and live with their natural parents, but could gravitate towards different mentors and personality in the village to learn and share quality recreational, leisure, and educational time with them, because everyone in the village basically has the same values and perspectives, there would be little or no inherent danger to the child, and a benefit for everyone.
We would in addition then be able to do something very important we are not currently benefiting from now and that is LEARNING THROUGH OUR CHILDREN by being broadly exposed to our children.
The current system of just teaching children, based on our perspectives, denies us the inherent knowledge of the universe our children are born with, and suppresses it, and distorts it, and robs us all.
Further what leads to serial killers more than anything is varied forms of isolation from the tribe that leave a person somewhat socially dysfunctional and create a mindset of sadistic dominance to capture interaction that all people need since we are social herd creatures?
So in a tribal, village, where there is a far greater degree of socialization and communication and sharing, predatory behavior will by and large disappear for a lack of need to be predatory!
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by Aronolac
Thanks for putting that out there, and I do believe that what open minded people posting to this thread are in fact seeing as that our beliefs and different levels of knowledge, philosophy and perspectives are very varied and myriad.
The other thing is for sure that those prone to indecision and inaction will have their choices made for them by circumstances forced upon them.
Whether its be off world beings, other dimension beings, deities, indescribable universal forces, man and man alone, or man partnered with such other described entities, the underlying truth is there is likely no shortage of those who would like to impose their will and their system, and genuinely believe its for the best.
Ultimately its going to be up to humans to decide to become the own masters of their evolution or if they wish to keep being grown or maintained in the ways other select humans or other entities and beings might prefer.
The future is not written in stone,
and while many people will reject the truth when it is put out there, it speaks poorly of any one group’s motivations and principles if they don’t put the truth of what they envision and plan out there in its entirety for people to decide of freewill.
Freewill should never be impinged upon, but one is only as free as the options that are presented to them, and that they are aware of.
I think the only caveat I am putting out there is to caution people that nothing needs to be written in stone,
that everything in fact changes, when you do, we do, we all do, and we share that.
Thanks.
That might be a real solution if we could get people to truly respect and not dominate or want to attempt to dominate in what has been the standard lack of regard for this present age.
They keep us distracted with all of these man made problems 'on' Earth, so we don't notice what is really happening 'to' Earth. Then they fly off to there new home they have been building with our money, but without us.
[and incase any one is wondering, no, I'm not religious in anyway, shape or form]
For hundreds of years people have been killed under the banner of holy wars and all such other things, what has killed more people, Religion or 'everything else' haha.
the problem is with religions creating sheeple.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by lowki
the problem is with religions creating sheeple.
NO! the problem is with leaders pretending to be part of religious groups that they're not and never have been.
yes, in the infintie multiverse.
each person is in charge of their own vibration,
with the self-vibration setting the channel,
that is the we that you experience.
so when you say what could get people to not want to dominate another person........... i just have to shake my head in disbelief, that you could be as well read as you are, and completely miss the obvious.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
If my worst enemy handed me a winning lottery ticket, in a filthy feces encrusted envelope, while flipping me the bird, it would still be the winning the lottery ticket!
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
reply to post by lowki
I don't buy into the whole reptilian theory stuff. I honestly think that the whole reptilian thing is just symbolism for some greedy, evil people. Soon, they will either have to change, or they will be no more.
So, nah, I don't agree with your analysis.