It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

If you can't beat 'em, join 'em.

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 03:26 PM
link   

How to abolish political madness in America



If we can't beat the federal government, then maybe we should just join the federal government. How? Abolish all states and state governments here in America. This would make for smaller government. Turn the abolished states into other Districts of the federal government to go along side District of Columbia. Let the District of Columbia be the only capitol. To help get the idea, Michigan would become District Michigan, Texas would become District Texas, Florida would become District Florida, and so on and so forth. Or, to be different than the name thing Michigan would become District 1, Texas would become District 2, Florida would become District 3, and so on and so forth. It would be no more called United States of America, no, it would be called District of America. Yes, named like the former capitol of the United States of America.

Why We The People should join the federal government? Why We The People should abolish state governments?

1) To lessen government.
2) So there is more power in We The People over the power of the federal government.
3) To say goodbye to state taxes.

Right now it's too many governments when all we need is one in this country. With one government in this country, that one government would be weak in comparison to its citizens.

So tell the state you reside in to go and knock off to allow Districts to surface.

We The People can resurrect. The federal government doesn't need the states, it just needs We The People to make this a reality. We The People just need to give the word, and the federal government, with its military, can easily free us from states. Of course the state Militias wont be a problem so as long as military might comes into play.

Too many governments as it is is the problem with this country. It's 53 governments in the U.S. Counted up by the number of states and the one federal government. Besides, the federal government we can make weak since it then wouldn't have the aid of state governments. It would be no more federal government having to be in the bed with the state governments. The state governments aren't fooling me. This is why we should obtain a one-country government here in America. Don't let the federal government spook you no more once the states are out the way.

The first state so full of itself and its illusion to get knocked off would become District 1. When We The People stand up with the federal government, then will the rest of the states fall away for Districts to stand up.


Getting rid of state governments would lessen the police force and the kinds of police. It would just be the feds working law enforcement. So less government indeed means less police. Right now it's a police state kind of, wouldn't you say?



[edit on 10-4-2010 by Tormentations]




posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 03:48 PM
link   
This idea is exactly what TPTB are trying to backdoor us with to get a One World Government and the NWO.



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 03:50 PM
link   
State government is not the problem with government and even California with its persistent progressive policies does not affect the over all health of the other states in the way the federal government does. There are states, and constitutions that these states have written to form a government, to protect the rights of those who reside in that state. These states, beginning with the first 13 Colonies, that gained independence and declared statehood, are the ones, who as a state representing the people of that state forged The Constitution for the United States of America.

That Constitution is a relatively brief document that outlines some specific, some less specific delegated powers to the federal government, and there is a Bill of Rights established with that Constitution to secure rights of the people and of the states. Thus, what has not been specifically, or implicitly delegated to the federal government, then resides with the states or people respectively. There is a purpose for this, and that purpose is because all good government is built from the bottom up, and not from the top down. The foundation of our government is the People, the structure are the states, and the bricks and mortar is the federal government, but it all stands, because of its foundation.

There is no authority to do anything near what you are suggesting in the Constitution, nor could any Amendment stand the Constitutional muster to survive jurisprudence. The states have been guaranteed a republican form of government, and that is technically what we have. In order to accomplish what you are suggesting, we would have to abolish the Constitution and start over, and I for one, am not at all in support of that. Besides, each state functions as it pleases, and there will be states that limit liberty less than others, and people are free to move to states with less taxation or other limitations of liberty, as they see fit. Your suggestion would eliminate this freedom.

If We the People are to take back the reigns of government usurped by ambitious politicians, we must begin with our own states. As We the People go through the process of reigning in state government, the federal government will, (although likely very stubbornly), follow suit.



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 06:04 PM
link   
The problem is not the federal govt, it's that private banks have hijacked the money supply.

This video explains it in detail:


Google Video Link


He also has a forum:

billstillsmonetaryreforum.com...

THE MONEY MASTERS is a 3 1/2 hour non-fiction, historical documentary that traces the origins of the political power structure that rules our nation and the world today. The modern political power structure has its roots in the hidden manipulation and accumulation of gold and other forms of money. The development of fractional reserve banking practices in the 17th century brought to a cunning sophistication the secret techniques initially used by goldsmiths fraudulently to accumulate wealth. With the formation of the privately-owned Bank of England in 1694, the yoke of economic slavery to a privately-owned "central" bank was first forced upon the backs of an entire nation, not removed but only made heavier with the passing of the three centuries to our day. Nation after nation, including America, has fallen prey to this cabal of international central bankers. Segments: The Problem; The Money Changers; Roman Empire; The Goldsmiths of Medieval England; Tally Sticks; The Bank of England; The Rise of the Rothschilds; The American Revolution; The Bank of North America; The Constitutional Convention; First Bank of the U.S.; Napoleon's Rise to Power; Death of the First Bank of the U.S. / War of 1812; Waterloo; Second Bank of the U.S.; Andrew Jackson; Fort Knox; World Central Bank;

[edit on 10-4-2010 by lucid_dream_tricks]

[edit on 10-4-2010 by lucid_dream_tricks]



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 07:02 PM
link   
If We The People would just seperate ourselves from the states from within and go on to petition the federal government to help abolish the states, we can make great change.

And yes, certain notice the problem is the federal reserve, not the federal government. Give that some thought for a change, people.



posted on Apr, 11 2010 @ 02:54 AM
link   
...... wow are you psyops ? Because idk if you have read your statements but they are completely backwards from reality.

Why would disbanding a state make there less government? It would just give federal government total control. How would they install that without the ability to have a federal police force? Use military.

Use ur stinkin brain.

The feds would step in and do whatever they want, just look at Wyoming, 60% of there land has been taken by the federal gov because they allowed the feds to specifically claim land in the state Constitution.

What do you think will happen when the fed has no Opposition?

Its like.Taking the front and back door off your house and hoping no one will steal from you.

It simply does not work like that.



new topics

top topics
 
0

log in

join