posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 09:07 AM
reply to post by Chadwickus
Sorry sir. I am a little disappointed with your casual observation and would invite you to take a 2nd look. I typically concur with your
evaluations, but I politely disagree on this one for the following reasons.
1. The 'artifact' is not visible at beginning of camera pan.
2. The 'object' appears to come from behind distant mountain range.
3. The motion of 'object' is not in sync with pan trajectory. i.e. the object appears to accelerate/decelerate unlike camera pan which is more
'linear' (Could be a sign of poor tracking if CGI.)
4. Camera pan CLEARLY ends before 'object' stops.
Not saying it is the real deal by any means, just worthy of further scrutiny.
I need to rip clip so I can re-encode to Quicktime and jog frame-by-frame for further analysis.
[edit on 10-4-2010 by kinda kurious]