It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Weatherman Slips... CHEM TRAILS

page: 7
72
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 9 2010 @ 11:47 PM
link   
reply to post by 11118
 


Oh so nice, if they would just report the facts like this more often we wouldn't have to guess at what they are actually doing. Flight 292 is delayed, shhh! we havn't finished loading the chaff.




posted on Apr, 9 2010 @ 11:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Boruma
 


I'm interested...

Though I have to ask, am I the contestant who doubted the lifelines or one of the lifelines?




posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 01:39 AM
link   
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 01:46 AM
link   
Why do they feel it necessary to use radar counter-measures over US soil? Do they expect to be shot down inside our borders? What are they hiding from? What are they hiding from US??? Haha I`m sure there`s a good reason out there, I just can`t seem to put my finger on it...



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 01:47 AM
link   
reply to post by doctor j and inmate c5779
 

It's called training.
Training for the pilots. Training for radar operators.



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 01:51 AM
link   
reply to post by doctor j and inmate c5779
 


Yes, they were doing a training exercise.

Or, they were doing a specialist exercise.

Or, they were doing a red flag exercise.

Do you not understand that anything the CIP come up with is just that, CoIntelPro exercise.

They try to come up with relative innocuous explanations. Keep engendering ideas. Frell them, they are everywhere. Now that PROOF is distinguished, pay attention to those that are the people that try and refute it.

THEY ARE THE CIP!



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 01:54 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 02:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
You're not going to breathe it in. By the time it reaches the ground it's pretty well dispersed.
If it happens to fall on you it might be a little unpleasant and give you an itch but you're not going to breath it in.






Please post information from the research you have found that "it might be a little unpleasant and give you an itch but you're not going to breath it in".

You have some evidence to back up your claims right?

[edit on 10-4-2010 by DetectingGovAgents]

[edit on 10-4-2010 by DetectingGovAgents]

[edit on 10-4-2010 by DetectingGovAgents]



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 02:06 AM
link   
reply to post by DetectingGovAgents
 

Well yes. But you have to be paying attention.
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 02:09 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 

Im paying attention.
Are you?

Please read again:
Please post information from the research you have found that "it might be a little unpleasant and give you an itch but you're not going to breath it in".

You have some evidence to back up your claims right?



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 02:11 AM
link   
reply to post by DetectingGovAgents
 

Well paying attention includes reading links. But since you seem to have a problem with that, here you go.

There is some evidence to suggest that exposure to airborne chaff could cause dermal irritation; however, it is unlikely that concentrations of airborne chaff at ground level would ever reach the level needed to bring about this effect.

www.iemr.org...


[edit on 4/10/2010 by Phage]



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 02:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by DetectingGovAgents

Originally posted by Phage
You're not going to breathe it in. By the time it reaches the ground it's pretty well dispersed.
If it happens to fall on you it might be a little unpleasant and give you an itch but you're not going to breath it in.






Please post information from the research you have found that "it might be a little unpleasant and give you an itch but you're not going to breath it in".

You have some evidence to back up your claims right?


ooooooh it's just like cat hair - shouldn't worry your allergies or asthma right? just wee liddle harmless filaments! Don't be so scared.


Who would have thought the weatherman is actually reporting real news!?

Oh that's right, there was another weatherman that has lifted the lid on many of these types of secrets (crimes) - and his name would be David Icke! (yay!
)...

... we should all keep our eyes on these weathermen - they may just be the people we need to listen to



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 02:36 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


HEHEHEHEHEHE

So, chaff is disbursed in 100's of miles of strips now.

Is this a NEW technique used in training exercises in the continental US now?

C'mon Phage, are your handlers that stupid? You probably told them we would not believe it, and then you probably told them that your cover is TOTALLY BLOWN!

So, what is it that they have been having YOU personally hide? Anything? Does your personal life have anything to do with it?



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 02:49 AM
link   
Well if chemtrails show up on radar, then we can be sure that 99.9999% of what people claim to be chemtrails are not chemtrails at all


We also now know that chemtrails are not visible from the ground and certainly do not disguise themselves as normal contrails and other high altitude clouds.

Excellent!

Oh, and also we know that chemtrails were most common during WWII and since then are much rarer and occur only on odd occasions in specific locations.



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 02:59 AM
link   


Upon release from an aircraft, chaff forms a cloud approximately 30 meters in diameter in less than one second under normal conditions.


Can someone provide a rough estimate on how large this cloud is?

Also, is it possible for such a large 'Chaff Cloud" to be created?

Lots of info on Chaff here -

www.globalsecurity.org...



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 03:35 AM
link   
Dont mean to hijack this very useful thread, but does anyone know how to use photobucket pretty well? I have about 2000 images of chemtrails over South Jersey and am trying to post it here and cant really get it right... Thanks in advance for any help...



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 04:59 AM
link   
Why is it so hard to realise that it doesn't take a large amount of chaff to get the large radar readout that we see?

It's doing what it's designed to do.

Distort and reflect radar signals. A DOPLAR radar with such a large range is going to get signals bouncing all over the place.

Anyway if what was seen on the radar was chemtrails, then this must be chemtrails too huh?




www.abovetopsecret.com...


Oh and I nearly forget, my handler reminded me! (see that's why us agents have handlers).

IF this radar reading is of chemtrails, then you chemtrailers should be able to carry out an experiment to prove your arguments.

Willing to do that??

I doubt it, you lot are all talk and no action!


Anyway. Here is the experiment.


Next time you see your chemtrails in the sky, note the time and location then get online and visit your local weather radar website and check out what the radar shows over the location you saw the chemtrails.

IF this theory is correct, then you should see your chemtrails on the radar right?

Right?

Thats why you all flagged this thread isn't it?

Because you believe that the OP has shown you evidence of chemtrails.

I await these results.!



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 05:12 AM
link   
there is a youtube clip from germany in that you can hear the weatherman say something like "...and those streaks over there are not natural.it's probably something brought up there by military planes"

wanna see? it's in german...

here we go: www.youtube.com...

it's translated

[edit on 10-4-2010 by Rohdan]



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 05:30 AM
link   
reply to post by endisnighe
 


No one is trying to discredit this.

People are merely trying to explain what the weather reader was saying (I doubt he has the qualifications to be a weatherman).

If using logic, common sense and a little bit of research is considered discrediting, well I'm guilty!

Those who actually believe it are idiots frankly speaking.

Same as those who believe there are people here being paid to "discredit" such things....



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 05:36 AM
link   
reply to post by Goethe
 


If you have the radar images that back up your assertion that they are chemtrails - as per this thread - I'll tell you
If not there's little point as what you actually have is probably just 2,000 pictures of contrails and natural clouds. For info, you can check the link in my sig to see what contrail are supposed to look like. That's why it's there




top topics



 
72
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join