It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Thurisaz
All the pompus BS is just that BS. My EX Husband was an alter boy in a boarding Catholic School and I can sure as hell asure you that my ONLY Son will never be raised in a Catholic School.
My Husband would have to kill me before I ever allowed that.
The Catholic Church is a haven for sick paedophiles...
Just this morning it was revealed in the Danish press, that our Bishop has TWO letters from the Vatican - one from 1962 and one from 2001 that both declared that child abuse was to be treated with the utmost secrecy and belonged under the heading "Papal Secrets" (my translation from Danish) and as such anybody revealing those secrets would be excumunicated.
The Catholic church is a corrupt and horrible edifice - I think it might be the Whore of Babylon referred to in the bible. I think all churches are corrupt, but especially this church.l
Out of the 75 Danish Catholic priests only 6 have provided the documentation required by law. The reason: Because it isn't in the law to demand the documentation for priests employed before 2005. Or so they claim.
The mere fact that they don't get the documentation for priests employed before 2005 is just another way of protecting their secrets. Another way to protect the criminal actions of the very persons who guide their flock of sheep.
The very same persons (popes and cardinals) who stick out guidelines on how to be a proper catholic are the ones responsible for protecting criminals within their ranks.
Your 4% should have been 0% After all we are talking about a religion who "are holier than thou".
Spanish Inquisition. Which Hunts. The killing of scientists on grounds of herecy. In newer times we have Mother Theresa. Lovely lady. Did you ever read the information on HOW the poor little orphans were treated in those orphanages.
All those who make excuses for this scum will share its fate..
Originally posted by CookieMonster09
Just this morning it was revealed in the Danish press, that our Bishop has TWO letters from the Vatican - one from 1962 and one from 2001 that both declared that child abuse was to be treated with the utmost secrecy and belonged under the heading "Papal Secrets" (my translation from Danish) and as such anybody revealing those secrets would be excumunicated.
What I find so strange about all of these alleged "letters" is that we never get to see the copies of the letter (an English translation would be helpful), and we never see the context in which these letters are written. Papal secrets? Can we see some evidence? All the letters that have been in the media have been small snippets. I have yet to see a media outlet release the full letter alleged to disclose a "cover-up".
It was not with regard to sexual abuse by priests, but specifically with regard to the ecclesiastical crime of solicitation. You can read it here:
Crimen Sollicitationi PDF
It's a document governing the ecclesiastical prosecution in ecclesiastical courts of priests who commit the ecclesiastical crime of solicitation. It stresses that someone who is witness to the ecclesiastical crime of solicitation is obliged to report it to the competent ecclesiastical authority so that this ecclesiastical crime of solication does not remain hidden. The ecclesiastical crime of solicitation relates specifically to the Sacrament of Penance where a priest in connection with the Sacrament seduces the penitent or allows himself to be seduced by the penitent. It's not about the sexual abuse of minors as the ecclesiastical crime of solicitation relates only to the Sacrament of Penance and can involve adults as well as minors. If you look up the word "solicitation" in a regular dictionary, you won't find the definition in there as it is ecclesiastical "jargon"
Quote:
This is really weird. Given how reluctant the Church is to impose excommunication on anyone, especially laypeople, for anything but the most serious reason, I find this nearly impossible to believe. Does anyone have any solid information on this?
The ecclesiastical crime of solicitation is very serious as it is an abuse of the Sacrament of Penance. That's why laypeople were obliged to report it. You should keep in mind that at the same time it is important to protect the reputation of a priest who may be innocent.
You should also keep in mind that many if not most or even the vast majority of cases of the ecclesiastical crime of solication wouldn't be a crime under civil law. Let me just give you one such hypothetical, simplified example: Suppose a priest hears the confession of a 30 year old woman. The 30 year old woman during the confession tells the priest: "Father, let's have a one night stand." The priest instead of saying, "No that is wrong" says, "OK let's do it tonight" then by that very fact the priest would be guilty of the ecclesiastical crime of solicitation. As you can see this is grossly misreported in the secular media due to their wilful ignorance and hatred of the Catholic faith and of Jesus Christ.
Read more: Catholic Answers
Is it really is the same proportion? Granted pedophiles will always be attracted to positions in the clergy of all religions. However, Protestant ministers, rabbis, etc. are all allowed to get married and have normal sex lives. Catholic clergy cannot. You cannot say celibacy plays no role in engendering or attracting pedophiles to the Catholic clergy.
Following your logic, it seems that every married person is a potential pedophile if they ever get into an argument with their spouse. Guys that are in miserable marriages go to adult prostitutes or take adult mistresses. They do not go after kids.
Originally posted by CookieMonster09
By HolgerTheDane
Out of the 75 Danish Catholic priests only 6 have provided the documentation required by law. The reason: Because it isn't in the law to demand the documentation for priests employed before 2005. Or so they claim.
First, the Danish Church is not the entire Church. Most countries - in the case of criminal activity - can subpoena records as enforced by the court.
Are your trying to tell me that Denmark has laws against subpoenaing records as it relates to alleged criminal activity? I highly doubt that. It's possible, but would be extremely rare.
Secondly, where is your evidence? And, please, don't post a link to a known anti-Catholic web site.
The mere fact that they don't get the documentation for priests employed before 2005 is just another way of protecting their secrets. Another way to protect the criminal actions of the very persons who guide their flock of sheep.
No, there is such a thing as a statute of limitations in most countries. You can't go on a witch hunt to defame the Church and try to subpoena Church records past the statute of limitations. It's called the rule of law.
The very same persons (popes and cardinals) who stick out guidelines on how to be a proper catholic are the ones responsible for protecting criminals within their ranks.
Your 4% should have been 0% After all we are talking about a religion who "are holier than thou".
I assume, therefore, you would say the same thing about any Protestant church, synagogue, day care facility, nursery school, kindergarten, etc.
Why single out the Catholic Church?
The 4% number is the same as what you will find in ANY clergy of ANY religious denomination.
Spanish Inquisition. Which Hunts. The killing of scientists on grounds of herecy. In newer times we have Mother Theresa. Lovely lady. Did you ever read the information on HOW the poor little orphans were treated in those orphanages.
The best you can do is come up with historical examples from centuries ago. First, the Spanish Inquisition was conducted by the Spanish Monarchy in 1478, not the Roman Catholic Church. It was a political body directly under the control of the Spanish Monarchy. Get your facts straight.
Witch hunts? From the 1400's? Is that the best you can do? You seem to gloss over the fact that both Jews, and Protestants were involved in witch hunts as well.
Mother Theresa. Here we go. A nun who dedicated her entire career to helping the poorest of the poor in Calcutta under the most impoverished conditions. And she won the Nobel Peace Prize. Critics allege (never proven in a court of law) that some of her patients were neglected. When no one else would care for these children, she did.
For every negative example you can give that defames the Church, I can show you thousands of examples of Catholic charity and philanthropy that is positive and uplifting.
Our Danish National TV-station gets a lot of it's stuff from Ritzau which is a news agent on par with Reuters.
Why the church chooses not to demand said documentation is anyonesd guess, but my guess is better than yours I think.
The church chooses not to ask. THAT is what I'm telling you.
No it isn't. The present pope and the one before as well as cardinals knew and kept it a secret.
Any church should have a 0% and when it goes above 0 then they should take measures to get back to 0. Religious leaders must not preach one thing and do anything less themselves. The Catholic Church with its priest, cardinals and pope is singled out in this thread - those are the ones we discuss at the moment.
If you want to help protect those who are abusers - so be it.
But please don't pretend that the cases are 20 or more years old and therefore without importance.