Blacks Are Brainwashed into being Democrats, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 22 times


reply posted on 9-4-2010 @ 05:10 PM by UmbraSumus
reply to post by alchemist2012



Do you think that the extended use of the term `African American` has been a divisive element between the citizens of the United States of America .
One does not see or hear the term Irish American / Italian American etc used with such frequency . (unless perhaps in the context of specific holidays or with some reference to their respective home countries)

Just a humble observation from across the pond .


reply posted on 9-4-2010 @ 06:04 PM by nixie_nox
reply to post by alchemist2012



Do you think every white person is going to show their racist side, especially in career government situations like the military?


reply posted on 9-4-2010 @ 06:48 PM by alchemist2012
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to
post by alchemist2012



Do you think every white person is going to show their racist side, especially in career government situations like the military?




Sometimes they do


reply posted on 9-4-2010 @ 07:32 PM by HappilyEverAfter
Originally posted by UmbraSumus
reply to
post by alchemist2012



Do you think that the extended use of the term `African American` has been a divisive element between the citizens of the United States of America .
One does not see or hear the term Irish American / Italian American etc used with such frequency . (unless perhaps in the context of specific holidays or with some reference to their respective home countries)

Just a humble observation from across the pond .





Yes sir I couldnt agree more, just more titles and separation by design.
Even in its attempt to somehow bring individuality and respect,
it hints of color and separation.
There are africans of many shades, and the same goes for the entire globe.
Just more S^&T, contrived to deal with.
I can honestly say I know an equal amount of haters wearing both political capes!
It's just more crap!


reply posted on 9-4-2010 @ 09:13 PM by Stewie
reply to post by skunknuts


Did you know, that since the thirties, the Republicans have voted far more often and in greater numbers than the Democrats FOR civil rights legislation?
Most people don't know that.
Before the thirties, it was ALL Republicans.
Most people look at the politics and initiatives of the Presidents we have had.
Big mistake, if you are talking Republicans versus Democrats.


reply posted on 9-4-2010 @ 09:16 PM by Stewie
reply to post by skunknuts


Also, I should add that the Democrats have severely wounded themselves. Not mortally, but enough so that they should be concerned about their own survival in the near term.
The Republicans are fine, I assure you. And, I am not one.
TEA Party? Well yes. (blush)


reply posted on 10-4-2010 @ 11:18 AM by maybereal11
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Originally posted by SaturnFX
egad...

Your historical understanding is lacking...but good luck with the thread anyhow.


That's pretty disingenuous Saturn. I don't know your age but history has been greatly bastardized about what happened as recently as the fifties and sixties of the last century.

It was mostly Democrats who fought against the Civil Right Act. That is a fact. Most of the old guard KKK were Democrats, that is also a fact.



Correct. Mostly Democrats opposed the Civil rights act because at the time the South was mostly Democrats. Though the bill was introduced and championed by Democratic administrations...First Kennedy and passed under Johnson after Kennedy was assasinated.

NOW THE SAME DEMOCRATIC SOUTH THAT OPPOSED THE BILL (Dixie Democrats) IS REPUBLICAN...understand?

THE SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS OF 1964 are the SOUTHERN GOP of TODAY.

Here take a careful read of the voting record for the Civil Rights act...It is regional...not Dem or Republican.



By party
The original House version:[9]

FOR - AGAINST

Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%-39%)
Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)
Cloture in the Senate:[10]

Democratic Party: 44-23 (66%-34%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)
The Senate version:[9]

Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%-31%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:[9]

Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)
[edit] By party and region
Note: "Southern", as used in this section, refers to members of Congress from the eleven states that made up the Confederate States of America in the American Civil War. "Northern" refers to members from the other 39 states, regardless of the geographic location of those states.

The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7-87 (7%-93%)
Southern Republicans: 0-10 (0%-100%)
Northern Democrats: 145-9 (94%-6%)
Northern Republicans: 138-24 (85%-15%)
The Senate version:

Southern Democrats: 1-20 (5%-95%) (only Senator Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
Southern Republicans: 0-1 (0%-100%) (this was Senator John Tower of Texas)
Northern Democrats: 45-1 (98%-2%) (only Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia opposed the measure)
Northern Republicans: 27-5 (84%-16%) (Senators Barry Goldwater of Arizona, Bourke Hickenlooper of Iowa, Edwin L. Mechem of New Mexico, Milward L. Simpson of Wyoming, and Norris H. Cotton of New Hampshire opposed the measure)

en.wikipedia.org...

Now take a look at this map showing the the electoral college for the last election...

politicalmaps.org...

[edit on 10-4-2010 by maybereal11]


reply posted on 10-4-2010 @ 12:04 PM by Xtrozero
Social physiology explains why many situations exist in our society including why the majority of minorities might be Democrat. You are going to associate with those who align themselves close to your lifestyle unless you have greater influence to change it. The Democrats see that there are more votes in the lower 50% income of the population, and this is why they seemed to have held the position of defender of the poor. They have created the “evil rich” to use as a tool in gathering their voter base of low income people.

Eight solid years under Clinton saw no betterment of the lower income, and four years under Obama will be smoke and mirrors too for them, but this doesn’t stop the Democrats from continuing their propaganda since the majority of that group don’t really understand or follow politics. I remember people saying they are going to vote for Obama because he was going to buy them a house or pay off their credit card bills etc. People are looking for free money, and handouts without any effort on their part and each one of these are votes. So who do you vote for? Those who want to reduce taxes of the evil rich or those who offer free money and services?

The problem as to why the black population in the US is low income is where we all should focus our efforts and social physiology is a big answer to changing this around. We cannot just yell at a black person and say “do something with your life!” for most are setup for failure the day they are born. Not only do they grow up thinking that they cannot be successful but society reinforces it from ALL directions. The Democrats are right in the mix of all this by telling them that they need the Government to provide all their needs, they do not try to reverse the situation that a large present of blacks are born live and die in, they feed and nurture it. To be a successful black you become “the evil rich” “uncle toms” “republican” “conservative” “turn your back on your heritage” etc when none of it is true.

The life of the poor where you are just existing is a hell all in itself, and to see truly capable people convinced this is their only life that they can have is a true travesty here in America. So one side wants people to be successful self sufficient members of society and the other side wants to provide everything for the population because the population just doesn’t know what is good for them. So until the day that young black people can feel that they can compete successfully with anyone else in life they will continue to drop into the other mode of just existence with Government subsistence their whole life. This lifestyle is very cancerous and so I do agree with the OP on this.



[edit on 10-4-2010 by Xtrozero]
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Memorial day thoughts.
  Posted 3 days ago with 11 member flags
Global governance and the challenge to the American Constitution
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags
Abraham Lincoln Filed a Patent for "Facebook\' in 1845..? (HOAX)
  Posted 19 days ago with 3 member flags
Explosive Scoop on Obama from Breitbart.com
  Posted 10 days ago with 1 member flags