It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
My thoughts are that if America conveniently allow Iran to develop Nuclear weapons (because all of these half-assed sanction efforts don't seem like they're really trying!) and then Iran nuke America, do the Yanks have a mandate to invade? Probably according to most Americans, yes.
What if Iran only try to nuke, say, New York, but are foiled by the brilliance of the CIA or some other American heroes? Or it is made to look this way? Do they still have that mandate? Probably - yes.
However, we don't actually need a suitcase nuke to go off in New York to justify an attack on Iran. We only need an attempt, or what is made to look like an attempt.
Originally posted by endtimer
reply to post by AzoriaCorp
Just when did America give North Korea the material to make nukes
with? When did this occur?
The American public has no say in what the government does. They
The same might well be true in upcoming days. If Congress can be convinced/bribed/persuaded, then the will of the people is moot. I hate like hell to be saying that, but I believe it to be the truth.
Originally posted by FoJAk
What's even more interesting to add is that now Obama is saying we won't retaliate against a non-nuclear country with nukes?! What if they do "covertly nuke us". They're saying we'll respond with just "conventional warfare". I see this as the perfect set up for a false flag operation to move into Iran.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Are the 30,000 uranium enrichment centrifuges in Iran pumping out U-235 also part of that false flag?