posted on Oct, 12 2004 @ 08:26 AM
I think you are confusing the lighter skinned and reddish-golden-blonde hair of the "non Semitic) Khazarian Turko-Ukrainian CONVERTS to Judaeism
(AD 780 toi AD 980) who are the socalled "Ashkenazim" today---the genetic result of centuries of the phenomenon of forced political-religious
"conversion of lighter skinned GOYIM" to the religion of Rabinnic Judaeism in the area around Kiev) ---
with the Semitic "Safardi "descendants who are in part related to the ancient Israelites, but themselves of mixed race and in no way "pure"
Even "King"David had Moabite blood, and these people were known to be darker skinned and often with thick black hair (something one of his sons
Absolom was [in] famous for--it killed him according to the legends in the "bible").
R. Yehoshua bar Yosef (the Galilean) was thought to have been partly Daviddic by blood lineage--at least according to traditions of the 1st century
Messianists who needed that Daviddic genetic component in his blood for him to be a candidate for the "christos" , so ipso facto, he would
necessarily have had some darker skinned/haired "Moabite" (i.e. arabic-shemitic but actually non Israelite) blood, like David's grandmother Ruth
("no Moabite shall ever enter into the Congregation of Israel, not even beyond the 10th generation ever" saith YHWH in the socalled torah--so much
for David !!)
The Gospel of John (for what it is worth as an historical source---very suspect since he claims "these things were written so that ye might believe
that Iesous is the Christos..." i.e. his overt apologetic propaganda purposes were admitted openly in the text) has the southern Judaeans "(Jews"
according to the KJV !) calling "Iesous" a "Samaratin" possibly because of his accent, but there were racial issues as well ("WE know who OUR
father is....") between southern Judaeans and northern mixed race Galileans who suffered more miscegenation from the Assyrian, Persian and Greek
invasions over the centuries (between BC 721 and BC 63)...
Either way, don;t confuse the genetic lineages of the NON SEMITIC LIGHTER SKINNED Ashkenazim converts with the SEMITIC DARKER OLIVE SKINNED Sefardi:
the two groups are not blood related.
90% of all modern day "Jews" are Ashkenazi converts and are NOT"semitic" ("sons of Abraham through Shem, hence Shemites) and not related by blood
to the ancient Israelites, hence most of the Ashkenazi tend to be lighter skinned (not all Kieven Khazarians were light skinned or lighter-redder
haired: there were two kinds apparently, the darker and the lighter variety, according to Koestler in his book The Thirteenth Tribe) .
Only 10% of world Jewry today has any Shemitic blood in them, and most of these olive skinned persons (some 900,000 persons) live in "Israel"
today, having come into "Eretz Yisra'el) from all over---Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, etc. and other Middle Eastern "diaspora" countries---but these
"semitic Jews" are not pure blooded: they had interbred fully with their local populations among whom they had been scattered for centuries--and
thus in the meantime, they vastly changed their "genetic heritage" to the point where Jews are no longer a "race" any longer.
For all the lighter skinned (goyim-descended, non semitic) post-Khazarian Converted Ashkenazim in the world today to say that "red hair" was a sign
of good luck, I think one would have to look at the process of mental-rationalisation-justification in their minds---to justify how "Jews" suddenly
became so white looking when in fact, the Israelites were of arab nomadic stock ("a wandering Syrian ready to starve was my father: a canaanite was
my mother" it says in the torah, placed into the mouth of "Abraham)".
So understand the solid genetic scientific reasons why modern day lighter skinned Israeli Ashkenazim are the colour they are...and why there are two
Judaeisms to day complete with TWO head Rabbis, one Safardi and one Ashkenazi----there are historical reasons why these two peoples are kept