It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wotan
If this so called NWO takeover thing has supposed to be going on for centuries than why didnt it come to fruition when Great Britain had the British Empire at its height, when it ruled a quarter of the planet?
According to some, the players are the same bunch.
And who the hell is the Black Pope?
Originally posted by Sibilance
A very enjoyable read and some interesting theories. However, this structure of power contravenes the theory that I believe in the most with regard to people and civilization which is entropy or an inevitable movement from order to chaos. No doubt that the organizations you have listed wield incredible influence and power, but I am skeptical of such a long-standing and ordered system of control. I believe, instead, that many of these players continually struggle internally as well as with each other to maintain their sphere of influence, which is waning with each passing year.
For example, the Vatican and the media are prime examples of monopolies that have suffered a tremendous erosion of power over the years. Competing religions, science and education have all cut into a major share of the monolithic power of the Vatican. The proliferation of alternative media such as radio, cable, and the internet especially have greatly undercut the "unified" media's griplock on information. Your post as well as the numerous responses and additions from others is a testament to how the natural evolution of chaos has and continues to drain off power and influence from these giants.
An increase in the universe's interconnectedness, or organized complexity,
Whether they were agreeing with you or not, the usual "those bastards" tone is palpable in many posters' comments in this thread, where they usually try to adapt their existing beliefs about shapeshifters, aliens, god, christ, lucifer and what not, depending on which tribal, social, ethical structure they subscribe to. But, I have to say, none of your comments seem to have much of an apparent sentiment in them. I find that quite refreshing I have to say). In that sense, if I may, I would like to ask you a few questions as well.
How would you describe your feelings about this order that you so well describe? How does this order, as opposed to an alternative order (past present, future, real, imaginary or whatever), effect you? I mean in an existential sense not political…
This order that is secret…
Why is it so?
If it has always been so, would it not always be so?
If there is this certain organization that runs the world while pacifying the masses with various myths, does it mean if it did not exist there would be no myth, no lies and no slavery or oppression, or does it mean that there would have been another one with a similar structure but with different stories (which, like China, already exist but are currently being devoured by Rome)?
Does the "world" ultimately need to be run by some organization or another to have order?
If civilization were an organism, is Rome its cancer or or is it its DNA?
Do you think the Pope (black or white) believes in God?
The difference between those who work for the ruling cabal, and those who slave for it, is those who work for it, didn't sell out cheaply!
For the reality is, if you give someone an inch they are bound to take a mile, and all you are seeing is an Ages old tug of war between the Elites, and the plebes and the slaves, over who is going to take the inch, and then the mile, and who is going to get dragged into the mudd pit!
The Elites in case you haven't noticed are winning the game, and the Plebes and the slaves are really failing at pulling back with collective strength on that rope.
Why because united we stand, divided we fall, and our collective resolve is negligible at best!
reply to post by time91
I read on one of your threads about how America's treaty with Britain ending the revolutionary war actually gave the king control of America and made him our treasurer. I looked it up and I did read in the first paragraph that he gets his power from being a prince of Rome (among other things) but I didn't fully understand the exact meaning of a lot of it so I'll just take your word for it.
Yet on ancient futurist's post it says Britain was in control of the U.S. 'since 1871'. Which one is it? If you guys could elaborate on that it would help me out, thanks.
EDIT: I know you would say Rome controls Britain anyway but I'm just assuming we were controlled through Britain in the past.