It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zosynspiracy
reply to post by Awory
One of the largest in the world? I'm so sick of hearing that tired old crap. Who cares if its the largest in the world when the tanks are 50 years old and the airforce consists of a few hundred planes that are themselves obsolete and outdated. My god...........people like you are clueless. If the US military ever went up against a real enemy with a solid air force and navy the loss of life would be staggering and the America people would probably lose their stomach. The Iranians are tough bastards. Make no mistake about it. I love seeing all our soldiers over in Astan humping through the desert with all their fancy gear, 60+ pound packs, camel backs, knee and elbow pads, goggles, gloves, etc. None of that crap makes a damn bit of different. 80% of the US defense budget is spent on worthless crap and waste. Our state of the art Navy would be absolutely useless in a ground war with Iran in the desert. I could go on and on............but some of my fellow Americans live in their little GI Joe America f'yeah bubble of a world. AMERICA IS BROKE! We are in debt up to our eyeballs. Hell most of us don't have jobs.
Originally posted by elevatedone
Reminds me of the 90's,
Saddam and his Republican Gaurd, who were going to wipe out the US Froces.
Originally posted by Faiol
us wont attack iran ...
they prefer to attack countries that dont have an army
lol ... war against insurgents really? if you get your home destroyed, I bet you would become an insurgent
deny ignorance
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
Originally posted by Faiol
us wont attack iran ...
they prefer to attack countries that dont have an army
lol ... war against insurgents really? if you get your home destroyed, I bet you would become an insurgent
deny ignorance
Saddam had one of the largest and most powerful armies in the world in 1991.
Within two weeks, a massive air campaign had brought it too its knees.
Most people simply don't comprehend what kind of air power, the US has.
If we fight Iran it will be like Iraq 1991. Meaning we will leave the country in ruins, establish no fly zones, and blockade it. Maybe after 12 years of laying seige, then we might decide to go in, if it is worth it.
Originally posted by disfugured
reply to post by Kaytagg
We were told Iraq had a more powerful army than Iran...
Who told you that ?
Iraq celebrated its victory in impressive ceremonies. But, suddenly, Saddam began a series of moves which frightened Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. He emerged with a million-man army, the biggest in the Middle East and described as the fourth largest in the world. The most frightening aspect was that, while Iraq appeared as a regional super-power in military terms, the country was virtually bankrupt in economic terms.
...Look what happened to the Iraq army. Quashed in 1 day.
This i Iran and from the info I've researched, Iraq doesn't have anything near what Iran has. Iran is not a third world country as many think and is one of the most modern countries in the ME.
People need to realize that states like Iran aren't really a threat to us, militarily, any more than Iraq was a threat in the early 2000s. Hell, Israel, alone, could win a war with Iran; and israel's military is even weaker than ours.
You mean countries like Iran.
Country and State are synonymous terms that both apply to self-governing political entities. A nation, however, is a group of people who share the same culture but do not have sovereignty.
Iran also has the largest paramilitary in the world. Invading Iran would hurt the US far greater than what Iraq did with the States.
Originally posted by Prime-Vector
reply to post by Faiol
They attack anyone they want, they have had weather control and a "death ray" since Tesla invented it before he died.
Small army, large army makes no difference to them, if they want it over they can make every iranian soldier believe there prophet is speaking to them and freak them out, they have done it in previous wars.
What technology and in which war was it used ? Never heard or read of anything like that happening.
Originally posted by elevatedone
Reminds me of the 90's,
Saddam and his Republican Gaurd, who were going to wipe out the US Froces.
Originally posted by Zosynspiracy
Where the hell do you think the Taliban and other terrorists are getting all their funding, weapons, support?
Originally posted by ExPostFacto
I wouldn't put it past Iran to detonate nukes on it's own soil to destroy an invading force.
If we fight Iran it will be like Iraq 1991. Meaning we will leave the country in ruins, establish no fly zones, and blockade it. Maybe after 12 years of laying seige, then we might decide to go in, if it is worth it.
Originally posted by Faiol
us wont attack iran ...
they prefer to attack countries that dont have an army
lol ... war against insurgents really? if you get your home destroyed, I bet you would become an insurgent
deny ignorance
I guess either you're young, or you weren't paying attention to the coverage at the time. Here's an example, though: www.highbeam.com... Iraq celebrated its victory in impressive ceremonies. But, suddenly, Saddam began a series of moves which frightened Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. He emerged with a million-man army, the biggest in the Middle East and described as the fourth largest in the world. The most frightening aspect was that, while Iraq appeared as a regional super-power in military terms, the country was virtually bankrupt in economic terms.
Where have you been doing your research? I have no doubt you'll find an article, somewhere, saying Iran is right on the cusp of being a threat to the USA, but in reality, this is not the case -- we saw the same rhetoric with Iraq, with Russia, with Vietnam, and more recently with China. It's always based on ignorance and -- imo -- a desire to have a fantasy escape from reality due to the tedious and unrewarding nature of most American's lives.
Not that this should matter at all, because it's semantics, but technically you are wrong, and it's incredibly sophomoric of you to actually, in bold face, try to correct me on this point: Country and State are synonymous terms that both apply to self-governing political entities. A nation, however, is a group of people who share the same culture but do not have sovereignty.
Who cares how large their paramilitary is? How is that relevant to anything?
Why do you think it would "hurt" the US any more than invading Iraq hurt us? And how is it hurting us, exactly? I haven't been hurt by Iraq -- have you?