Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by ibiubu
I'm definitely no stranger to it.
I've spent years studying all manner of cosmological theory.
Occam's razor has been my guide while navigating the mine field of alternative theories.
Plasma cosmology is the correct cosmology.
Lorentz relativity is the correct relativity.
Standing waves account for all quantum strangeness AND the failure of the Michelson Morley experiment to detect the aether.
All matter is made of waves.
All light is made of waves.
The universe is infinite with a universal speed - Maxwell's equations are correct.
Quantum field theory, special and general relativity are incorrect. They are bogus shams of science that have no grounding in physical reality. They
are obtuse. They are a fraud. They are peddled by scientists acting as priests.
[edit on 7-4-2010 by mnemeth1]
you seem to be convinced that all matter is made of waves. IF you say that everything came from electrons, and electrons are all waves (by your same
reasoning) then I myself am made completely of waves. and yet how can this be? if this were true then i would be able to walk through the walls
simply by forcing electricity into myself or the wall so it resonates at a different frequency. I just find this fanciful and outright ignorant. If
all matter is made up of waves, then how are particles formed?
So there are no particles then. What is a proton? or a neutron? or any element? are they all waves? while i feel that a lot of science can be hokey
and imagined that is where it all started. Everything comes from a made up assumption, and we CHANGE THE THEORIES not the OBSERVATIONS to match. If
i perform a test and it doesnt happen the way i want it too then i dont skew the results i rethink my theory (which mind you isnt a law) and i start
over. The LHC is the first chance to test many of these far out theories you denounce and yet you denounce it before it has a chance to become fully
as for electrons being only waves, how do you explain the double-slit experiment? i would really appreciate your input on this seeing as you have
skirted around answering many questions that are put up to question your theories (which, as a man of science, you should expect everything to be
follow the link and see for yourself that they have tests proving particle-wave
duality. please dont just dismiss this as "lies" because that would make you no better then the people you are criticizing. Im not what you would
call a denouncer, just a skeptic. I like to have proof of something like you, and when i have proof that isnt what i wanted to see i dont just ignore
so feel free to ignore what ive said, or posted, or the PROOF that ive given to show that at least some of what you are saying is wrong
but it would be much better to strike it down with proof of your own.
and as an aside, Occam's Razor is a qualitative method, not a quantitative one. it is based on the users world view as to what is simpler and should
not be applied to super general topics, its circular logic at that point, which makes it worthless for some of the things you apply it to so readily.
just food for thought.
so please give me proof of what you are saying is true in tests and you will have one more follower, if not just another skeptic in the crowd.
the truth is out there, all we need to do is find it