reply to post by mnemeth1
It was constructed to waste money. It was constructed to bloat the paychecks of the scientific elite. It was constructed to bloat the bottom
lines of government contract workers. It is a sham. It is a rip off. It is a joke.
I have to agree, it is a sham. The standard model doesn't even predict the actual mass of the Higgs Boson, which is the main purpose behind the LHC.
Without known a specific mass of this mysterious particle, how can they be sure that the billions spent to search for it at the energy levels of the
LHC are enough? What if the LHC can't observe it, then what? We spend a trillion dollars to build a bigger one as world population increases and food
Cosmology is a joke. The same scientific suppression we saw in the Climategate scandal is alive and well in the field of theoretical physics.
The physicists are milking us like cattle for our tax dollars. Scientists can replicate the formation of galaxies and stars using standard Newtonian
physics by simply adding the electric force into the models.
It's a shame that the majority of the naysayers don't know about hoe we can reproduce what we see in space in labs, right down from the filamentary
web like structure of the large scale universe right down to the formation of solar systems. All under electrical phenomena. Instead they whine about
sources rather than taking the intellectual initiative to research and fact check.
We are insulted and belittled as if we are simple minded children whilst they hang onto a hundred year old dying model of the universe. We point out
the greedy faults of science today, while they forget the greedy faults of old sciences yesterday now proven wrong. We are liken to Galileo and they
to the church, and like the church, they will fight that comparison to the death.
Space does not expand, bend, warp, twist, or in anyway do anything other than exist as a place that matter occupies. Matter itself does not
bend space, warp space, or cause holes in space. Matter is stable and obeys coherent laws of provable physics that range from the level of the
electron all the way up to the level of galaxies. There are no multiple dimensions, multiple realities, or time traveling particles.
The only reason we have the notion of an expanding and warping quality to space is due to the current standard model of the universe, many people
don't realize that either. We can't observe space itself expanding and to me, the concept is counter-intuitive with what we observe. Scientists are
also now realizing something I've though for a very long time now, that time doesn't exist. This scifi notion of time travel is impossible, there is
no fourth dimension nor will we ever produce enough energy to reverse entropy.
Gravity is an electromagnetic function of matter. It arises from matter. It varies and is not constant. When scientists try to measure it they
find gravity changes and varies from place to place. There are no consistent measurements of gravity. All methods of measuring gravity produce the
same inconsistent results.
Yep, if we change how we think about gravity and how it works as some newer recent theories and modifications do, then we solve quiet a few problems
with the need to invent new magical invisible forms of matter. To bring that point to light, the so called missing mass is now finally no longer
missing. This hurts the current model as it is now built around magic mass.
The Earth was not formed out of dust circling the Sun. The provable physics of dust in space absolutely prevent dust from forming into planets.
This is most obvious in the rings of Saturn. Planets don't form from dust circling bodies. Even the standard theory’s own models fail to show how
this is possible. Also, all other planets discovered to-date around other stars have turned out to be closely orbiting gas giants. This is impossible
to explain if gravity formed the planets around the stars.
I actually LMAO at the person who provided that cold welding link. The inability of some to read an article being used as a counter argument astounds
me. In that same link, it actually says cold welding in the vacuum of space *DOES NOT* happen. I have to repeat this one.... Cold dust in space does
*NOT* nor *CANNOT* coalesce into planets, stars or galaxies. This is what the standard model predicts happens and what the actual physics behind cold
dust says cannot happen.
Space is not expanding, there was no big bang. The red shift of light coming from distant sources arrives in discrete steps meaning the Earth
must be the center of the universe if the big bang theory is true, thus its not. We see high and low red shifted objects interacting with each other
in space, impossible if red shift is a function of velocity. We have laboratory proven effects of light acting in a vacuum that can account for all
observations in space without the need for a big bang or expanding space.
Red shift has already been proven to be a faulty measure. We can see highly red-shifted objects in space that are connected by bridges of matter and
yet we're told that EVERY SINGLE ONE is just a mere coincidence? That's a complete crock given that redshift is inaccurate. We don't even know how
far away objects in space are, so how can they say for a fact that redshift is accurate? It's complete bull crap in order to hang onto a hundred year
old model rather than conceding that we don't have the answer to that particular question yet.
The oceans of earth didn’t arrive here from comets slamming into the earth. This is a joke of a theory. All observations of comets show them
to be made almost entirely of rock.
Hell, anyone who disagrees with that can just look up the comet Hale-Bopp. It was too far away for the sun to melt ice, well past the orbit of Uranus
and yet still remained active. This doesn't make any sense for a dirty snowball view of comets, but is explainable under electrical phenomena.
Scientists are finally no longer believing that comets gave rise to the oceans after discovering that the water in comets is too 'heavy' compared to
normal water on earth. Now they are saying the oceans arose the water molecules in the cloud of dust that gave rise to our solar system, which as
we've already learned.... cold dust does not and cannot coalesce into stars and planets. This yet again validates the electric model of the
Theories of tectonic plates sliding around producing mountains are a joke. In order for this to be true, the plates must be sliding into rock
that is more dense than granite. Core samples of the ocean floors show them to be relatively new. All fossils are found on dry land, not ocean floors.
This means the floors are being ADDED to the earth by matter rising out of the earth. This makes logical sense since the earth is rotating and
centripetal force is pushing deep matter outwards while gravity is pushing outer matter inwards.
I used to think this was rubbish till I researched it more and gave it serious thought. Given that our universe is electric, I do support an expanding
Earth and it does make sense. I urge people to look into it as they put aside their 'the church is right, we're special' mentalities. I mean, just
try and learn something different for once.
The history of the Earth as it has been told to you is a lie. Theoretical particle physics is a lie. The big bang is a lie. Comets made of
water is a lie. The formation of planets is a lie. Climate science is a lie.
And it's a costly needless lie continued by greed of money and pride of wanting to be right about a dying hundred year old model.
[edit on 12-4-2010 by sirnex]