It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The explosive deterrent to nk aggression

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 4 2003 @ 04:29 PM
link   
24 long range bombers have been stationed in guam to show americas air power? or something like that. anyway here ya go from the greatest news biased media

News about bombers

[Edited on 01/20/2003 by phoenix_cross]




posted on Mar, 4 2003 @ 07:34 PM
link   
What's the problem ? Seems like a logical step to me. This message is just as powerful as parking CBG off the North Korean coast, with less risk.

Should I read anything ino your comment about CNN being biased ?



posted on Mar, 4 2003 @ 09:07 PM
link   
i read in USA TODAY bout the attack on Iraq that the US has officially said the have a e-bomb. Hmm what does this sound like to you. They had a dumbed down version givin by tyhe military sayin it would essentually turn of all the lights in Iraq. I think the same type weapon would be way more effective here. I also dont think the US is just flexing their mucle here i think they're quitely moving in the means of attacking swiftly and quietly while suprising ol' Kim



posted on Mar, 4 2003 @ 09:26 PM
link   
Yes the high powered microwave generator would be most effective in North Korea. Maybe they are just waiting to get enough weapons into postion so they can fry everything at once.



posted on Mar, 5 2003 @ 05:05 PM
link   
this is a move by the us gov in preperation for a soon to be attack on iraq. by putting these bombers into position, it helps to keep nk in check from taking advantage of the oppurtunity to strike sk while we are dealing with baghdad. so if anything this tells me expect war in iraq soon, real soon.



posted on Mar, 5 2003 @ 05:49 PM
link   
who's to say there isn't a large group of NK fighters ready to smash these bombers. bombers may be heavy duty against ground targets, but against fighters without an escort of their own, they're toast before they're in the toaster? either way it is clearly a show of 'two can play at this game' by the US.

in regards to the earlier post, CNN has given false or corrupted info more than once, and is biased against the opponents side, do they ever mention the north kirean veiw on things? no. but then again their veiw is like trippin on acid, so there isn't much to tell. it's just that connie chung pisses me off. i dunno why.



new topics

top topics
 
0

log in

join